Fwd: Re: [Imc-india] national site vs cities, regions??

[Sivaraman Balachandran]

oops.  

i hit reply and it went to the sender instead of the
list.


--- Boud Roukema <boud_roukema@camk.edu.pl> wrote:
> Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2001 22:40:00 +0200 (CEST)
> From: Boud Roukema <boud_roukema@camk.edu.pl>
> Reply-to: Boud_Roukema@camk.edu.pl
> To: Sivaraman Balachandran <sivbala@yahoo.com>
> Subject: Re: [Imc-india] national site vs cities,
> regions??
> 
> Sivaram
> 
> > this was from a discussion from several months
> ago.  i
> > think having a country wide india site is ok
> because:
> > 
> > 1. we can have both national and local sites.
> > 2. the majority of imc sites outside of the us,
> canada
> > and australia are country sites. i believe to ask
> that
> > there not be an imc-india site in order to defer
> to
> > local sites is not fair.
> > 
> > more to come.
> 
> Fine by me either way. I don't think I have much
> moral
> right to decide (let alone practical opportunity).
> 
> BTW, you replied to me here only in private email. 
> Wouldn't it be
> better to respond to imc-india@lists.indymedia.org
> (except if you have
> something private or security-related to say)? Just
> because I've
> written many messages doesn't mean I want to become
> a "leader"!
>  
> > i have to go back to work.
> 
> OK, catch you later.
> Boud.
> 
> 


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get email alerts & NEW webcam video instant messaging with Yahoo! Messenger
http://im.yahoo.com