[Boston-editorial] feature on Gentrification in JP

[petrina]

the phone # doesn't bother me, and although i'm new
and don't claim to be an expert on journalism (yet) i
do think it would be a little bit of censorship to
take it down. i suppose you have a point about maybe
it being a business # instead, but it still doesn't
bother me, especially if it's public information. i
know i'm being kinda wishy-washy here but i'm not even
sure it would make us look bad if someone complained
the # was on our site. i'd be open to hearing more of
what people have to say though and what cases we've
had in the past that are similar. petrina


--- Matthew Williams <mw21 at mindspring.com> wrote:

> I still have strong reservations. I would much
> prefer to see the 
> developer's office number up there, instead of his
> home number. Yes, he 
> is a public figure like the mayor, but people call
> the mayor at his 
> office. And no one said this isn't an important
> issue.
> 
> Come on, does someone else besides Pete, Sofia and
> me have an opinion? 
> Tim? Rob? Joe? Petrina? Nicole?
> 
> -- Matt
> 
> On Apr 6, 2005, at 4:33 PM, Pete Stidman wrote:
> 
> > cheers!  JP salutes you!
> >
> > -Pete
> >
> >
> > --- Sofia JarrinT <sofiajt at yahoo.com> wrote:
> >
> >> hi Pete,
> >>
> >> No one is discussing that gentrification is such
> a
> >> problem, but since I'm not about to change your
> mind
> >> about the phone # because it's such an important
> >> issue
> >> to you, I'll leave the discussion here.
> >>
> >> cheers,
> >> Sofia
>



		
__________________________________ 
Yahoo! Messenger 
Show us what our next emoticon should look like. Join the fun. 
http://www.advision.webevents.yahoo.com/emoticontest