[IMC-Boston-Editorial] a couple online editorial decisions?

[Jonathan D. Proulx]

On Mon, Dec 05, 2005 at 09:32:25AM -0800, Sofia JarrinT wrote:
:Very cool, indeed! I would lower the waiting day  period from 5 to 7 days (unless there is a specific request to  lenghthen the time to 7, if the topic is deemed to be too sensitive for  discussion) and the affirmative votes from 5 to 3.  That just for  now, since there are 5 active editors (or 4? not sure sharpie's  editing), and we wouldn't be able to reach the requirement  needed.  We can up the vote to 5 when we get more people.   But I think the idea of having two thirds consensus is a good one.

I'm fine with those numbers,  It's rare I go more than 48hr without
reading mail, and usually read it constantly so I think that the wait
period should be driven by those will the least net access an dpicked
somthing high.

For number of editors perhaps we should say 2/3 so we don't need to
keep revising.

-Jon