[IMC-Boston-Editorial] Comments, Questions and the letter

[Sofia JarrinT]

Yes, that's how I understood it.  Online  consensus would not replace the meetings but facilitate small decisions  online and allow us to move ahead.  Jon's suggestions again are at:
  
  http://lists.indymedia.org/pipermail/boston-editorial/2005-December/1205-ax.html
  
  In regards to the Militarism category, it really came up because there  have been a few articles about recruiting that do not fit any of those  categories.  I ran into that w/my article.  It's really not  about human rights...  It's a bit about education, but not  really.  Racism? Maybe the new category should only be called  Militarism instead of War & Mil.  I mean, war articles  definitely fit under human rights, politics, international, etc.
  
  And I definitely agree that the fewer the categories, the better.   For example, I really don't see a need for: DNC (clearly, Politics),  both Gender and GLBT/Queer (merge into one?), Social Welfare (i'm not  sure what that entails). Maybe we can go over all of them at the mtg.
  
  And yes, I'm available on Sun. December 18th.
  
  papas fritas,
  sofia
  
  "Jonathan D. Proulx" <jon at csail.mit.edu> wrote:  
My Idea for online consensus is to use the guidelines for policy
changes or decisions for which we have no policy, basicly the stuff we
currently need to wait for meetings to do. 

Is that the part that was unclear? were others thinking the same
thing?

-Jon
_______________________________________________
Boston-editorial mailing list
Boston-editorial at lists.indymedia.org
http://lists.indymedia.org/mailman/listinfo/boston-editorial



		
---------------------------------
 Yahoo! Personals
 Single? There's someone we'd like you to meet.
 Lots of someones, actually. Yahoo! Personals
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.indymedia.org/pipermail/boston-editorial/attachments/20051206/08b6d924/attachment.html