[Boston-editorial] is this a polic violation

[sharpie at riseup.net]

i agree. there wer several posts to this article that were fairly
ridiculous, this guy is kind of a dick and makes some comments i wouldn't
make, but there areplenty of other comments on this article that deserve
to be hidden and are just ridiculous, before this one.

also, just a note, what do i need to do to get an editorial password?

sharpie

> THis is why I like the "without substance" part of the
> guideline.  This guy is pissed, but he backs it all
> up.  "coo-coo" on the other hand, and "laughing" both
> made personal attacks on the general public that had
> no content.  They insulted to insult, not to argue.
>
> Maybe we should change the wording of our guideline to
> reflect this.
>
> something like:
>
> Comments that are derogatory without dialogue or
> content.
>
> -Pete
>
>
> --- Matthew Williams <mw21 at mindspring.com> wrote:
>
>> Hello all --
>>
>> Check out the comment by "um, yeah" on this thread
>>
> http://boston.indymedia.org/feature/display/38767/index.php
>> . Is this a
>> personal attack we should hide or merely issue a
>> warning? (My
>> inclination is to do the latter.)
>>
>> -- Matt
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Boston-editorial mailing list
>> Boston-editorial at lists.indymedia.org
>>
> http://lists.indymedia.org/mailman/listinfo/boston-editorial
>>
>
>
>
> __________________________________
> Yahoo! Mail Mobile
> Take Yahoo! Mail with you! Check email on your mobile phone.
> http://mobile.yahoo.com/learn/mail
> _______________________________________________
> Boston-editorial mailing list
> Boston-editorial at lists.indymedia.org
> http://lists.indymedia.org/mailman/listinfo/boston-editorial
>