[Boston-editorial] should we feature this?
Jonathan D. Proulx
jon at csail.mit.edu
Tue Jun 28 12:20:38 PDT 2005
On Tue, Jun 28, 2005 at 02:52:48PM -0400, Matthew Williams wrote:
:Good idea, Tim. I did a Lexis/Nexis search on the bill's name--and once
:again turned up nothing. So we know it's real bill but that no one else
:is reporting on but Alex Gould.
:
:Now that I think about it, I agree with Sharpie it is a little bit
:fishy that there is no other coverage of it. If the bill was as bad as
:Gould makes it out to be, you would think some activist group would
:have a critique of it on their website.
:
:I guess I lean towards not featuring it now.
So did my emails get through? I sent this out about 10am but many
emails have gone by that seem as though noone got it.
it's a real bill and the union local he mentioned has a story on it.
I haven't had time to see if the stories match in any way but it's out
there:
here's the full text of the bill mentioned:
http://www.rilin.state.ri.us/BillText/BillText05/HouseText05/H6099.htm
and here's the union local he mentioned
http://www.nehceu.org/
The union's story on all this:
http://www.childcareri.org/1199_our_campaign.php
-Jon
More information about the Boston-editorial
mailing list