[Boston-editorial] Why is anti-capitalists on the march hidden?
Matthew Williams
mw21 at mindspring.com
Mon May 2 08:23:34 PDT 2005
It says "[Unknown reasons]". I think that means there was a technical
glitch of some sort--or perhaps they didn't finish posting their
article properly. This was the same problem that happened when Aimee
Smith flipped out about her article disappearing a year or so ago. I'm
always hesitant to unhide such articles because it may be they began
posting them, then changed their minds for some reason midway through
and thus it comes up as hidden. If you want to unhide it though, Pete,
go ahead. It may be a good idea in this case.
I guess it would help us in the future to know exactly what causes
something to be hidden for "[Unknown reasons]". Does anyone on the tech
team know for sure?
-- Matt
On May 2, 2005, at 10:48 AM, Jonathan D. Proulx wrote:
> On Mon, May 02, 2005 at 07:33:26AM -0700, Pete Stidman wrote:
> :anybody know?
> :
> :people are gonna be pissed if they didn't hide it themselves...
>
> Could they have hidden it? It doesn't look as if it was posted by
> someone logged in and anonymous users can't edit can they?
>
> I'm suspicious we may still have a ghost in the machine as it were.
> Anyone know how to change the DataBase password without seriously
> breaking the site?
>
> Even if someone in editorial did hide this for some reason I don't
> see, it would be a good idea.
>
> -Jon
> _______________________________________________
> Boston-editorial mailing list
> Boston-editorial at lists.indymedia.org
> http://lists.indymedia.org/mailman/listinfo/boston-editorial
>
More information about the Boston-editorial
mailing list