[Boston-editorial] Why is anti-capitalists on the march hidden?

Matthew Williams mw21 at mindspring.com
Mon May 2 08:23:34 PDT 2005


It says "[Unknown reasons]". I think that means there was a technical 
glitch of some sort--or perhaps they didn't finish posting their 
article properly. This was the same problem that happened when Aimee 
Smith flipped out about her article disappearing a year or so ago. I'm 
always hesitant to unhide such articles because it may be they began 
posting them, then changed their minds for some reason midway through 
and thus it comes up as hidden. If you want to unhide it though, Pete, 
go ahead. It may be a good idea in this case.

I guess it would help us in the future to know exactly what causes 
something to be hidden for "[Unknown reasons]". Does anyone on the tech 
team know for sure?

-- Matt

On May 2, 2005, at 10:48 AM, Jonathan D. Proulx wrote:

> On Mon, May 02, 2005 at 07:33:26AM -0700, Pete Stidman wrote:
> :anybody know?
> :
> :people are gonna be pissed if they didn't hide it themselves...
>
> Could they have hidden it?  It doesn't look as if it was posted by
> someone logged in and anonymous users can't edit can they?
>
> I'm suspicious we may still have a ghost in the machine as it were.
> Anyone know how to change the DataBase password without seriously
> breaking the site?
>
> Even if someone in editorial did hide this for some reason I don't
> see, it would be a good idea.
>
> -Jon
> _______________________________________________
> Boston-editorial mailing list
> Boston-editorial at lists.indymedia.org
> http://lists.indymedia.org/mailman/listinfo/boston-editorial
>



More information about the Boston-editorial mailing list