[IMC-Boston-Editorial] pentagon spam

[Jonathan D. Proulx]

On Wed, Aug 23, 2006 at 05:45:05PM +0000, visnusdream at juno.com wrote:
:It looks good to me. We could hide the articles themselves for being unintelligible, but if you 
:don't think they represent a waste of space at this time, its not worth it.
:Jamie 

if any are still on the front page we cold hide on that basis, if not
the space they take up isn't very valuable real estate...

I don't want to feed any of the paranoid trolls the "Boston Indymedia
sensors postings at Request of the Penatagon" headline.  If it was
john_q_public at random-isp.net I'd have just hidden the articles and
been done with it (after verifying the claimant really did control
that address)

-Jon