[IMC-Boston-Editorial] That feature

[visnusdream at juno.com]

I gotta agree with Sharpie. 
It has no Boston tie in, and its just a lot of political theory. It didn't even keep my interest.
This article was originally published in the Local section and I moved it to elsewhere. That was two or three days ago.
Anyway, it doesn't feel like a feature to me. Editorial is OK but it needs a Boston Tie in. 
I wish we could have like a "page two" or some place to but stuff like this, with pictures etc. So people could see, hey someofthe IMC folks thought this was especially cool butdidn;t feature it. 
I mean I'd like a third space to put things that we think are cool but that do not quite muster centerpiece status.  See a lot of good stuff bumped off the elsewhere because people just post stuff with little value. 
Maybe thats something to suggest for the new site.
As far as consensus on features goes. I don't mind if someone centers something without consensus, but I think a heads-up ought to go through the Ed list, at least after the fact. I also think that if anything is moved from the feature section, even if no one was notified that a new feature was made, that a heads up ought to go to the Ed list. 
 
 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.indymedia.org/pipermail/boston-editorial/attachments/20060114/6418f180/attachment.html