[IMC-Audio] lower #'s?
a3ulafia at gmail.com
Thu Aug 5 16:04:35 PDT 2004
it's purely technical. How can you squese the highest quality out of
the worst Internet connection. I did some listening test with the
technicaly superior ogg vorbis format and low bitrates (aka #'s). Read
all about it here:
On Tue, 3 Aug 2004 21:13:26 +0200, zaza <zazaza at xs4all.nl> wrote:
> Hmmm Ok thanks. I'm not sure if that is what # normally stands for but
> never mind and hence my confusement.
> Radio Netherlands ain't half bad yes, check out http://vrijeradio.tk too
> for some other shit.
> So much for today's spam, I believe we were in chat the other day,
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Mr.Liberal II" <bstoleelection at fastmail.fm>
> To: <imc-audio at lists.indymedia.org>
> Sent: Tuesday, August 03, 2004 8:21 PM
> Subject: Re: [IMC-Audio] lower #'s?
> > What I meant by lower #'s is when,like when I use CoolEdit/FreeRip
> > convert analog sound to MP3 to post at Arizona Indymedia,is use
> > #'s: 11025/mono/8bt 16 KBPS
> > With an old computer that I use,this is the best that I can do.
> > Besides,it doesn't cause buffering for people whether they use slow
> > dial-up or faster broadband to listen to.
> > PS:I noticed you are in Netherlands. Every Saturday night I listen
> > Radio Netherland on my vacumm tube shortwave radio. Radio
> > is great!!
> > AZ Radio IMC
> > On Tue, 3 Aug 2004 19:53:24 +0200, "zaza" <zazaza at xs4all.nl> said:
> > > 'leu,
> > >
> > > A while ago it was suggested here that using lower "#'s" would be
> > > helpful for increasing the quality of your lo-rate streams. What was
> > > meant by # in that context? One would think ports but I can't see
> how it
> > > would matter. Or did it just refer to bitrates, or...?
> > >
> > > Thanks in advance,
> > >
> > > P.
> imc-audio mailing list
> imc-audio at lists.indymedia.org
More information about the imc-audio