[Imc-beirut] EDITOR: ARAFAT'S GHOST IN GAZA
realignment at hotmail.com
Mon Aug 15 14:47:06 PDT 2005
EDITOR: ARAFAT'S GHOST IN GAZA
'Echoing Arafat's famous battle cry, Qurei said: "We will proceed from one
victory to another until we achieve the big victory when one of our roses
or juveniles will hoist the Palestinian flag on the walls of the Old City
[of Jerusalem] and its minarets and churches." '
In 1994 Yasser Arafat was awarded a "peace prize".
In plain sight is the same pattern. Arab attack.......then Arab explanation
of being the victim.
Relentless brutality and murder is condoned by the actions and statements of
outside groups. In 2005 thousands of people are being expelled from
Arabs isolated Israelis and the Arabs now called Palestinians. The Arabs
never offered or allowed citizenship to Arab/Palestinians. Arabs consumed
93% of the League Of Nations post WWI British Mandate and French
Mandate. The Arabs forced the Arab/Palestinians to become 'refugees' and
Israel has been under attack by the adjacent Arabs since the British
Land was mandated after a war which is not unlike anyother record of
history. But the Israeli portion of the mandate was reduced. That
reduction may have had some relation to the discovery of oil in Arab nations
and the enormous power that yielded. It may also relate to appeasing a
majority simply for convenience.
Arabs attack under the guise that the land of Israel is their land but Arabs
didn't mandate after WWI. The Allies mandated after defeating the Central
Powers. Why so many many concessions to Arabs with callous disregard for
More important, why does the Arab warfare persist? What do they gain from
attacking Israel which is a fraction of the region's land. What's the
benefit they seek from killing anyone who happens to be in Israel?
Ignoring their explanations, what's the motive? What do they gain or
The Arab/Palestinian rhetoric, which enables cont'd attacks against Israel,
is co-opted by a peculiar variety of organizations, movements, religious
groups and news agencies . There's no need to include Middle East
Gov't/News agency reports. Some of these disparate groups seem to be
unconcious of what they promote as utopians promoting dystopia. They have
in common the claims to be "doing their job" or arbitrarily claiming self
righteousness and equivalency while working to delegitimize Israelis and
ie "...The bombings July 7 in London were quickly labeled terrorist attacks
by the wire services. But a July 12 suicide bombing outside a Netanya,
Israel, shopping mall was attributed to "Islamic Jihad militants," a group
on the U.S. State Department's list of terrorist organizations. "
The Jewish are an indigenous people with thousands of years of history in
the region. They are also a minority with many diaspora. They were
awarded a territory after a war. That's the history of the world. Why is
this particular circumstance contested at all?
The Israelis are not threatening any people, they're not promoting guerilla
warfare locally or worldwide. They don't claim a 'religious' imperative
against the rest of humanity. The state of Israel is not initiating
relentless attacks. Their enemy use the identical tactics and rhetoric as
the terrorist guerillas worldwide. Yet some follow this defacto mandate
to condemn Israel and align with their violent enemy.
There are attacks against civilians worldwide now; Iraq, London, USA, Bali,
Beslan, Thailand, Madrid, the Phillipines, possibly China, et al, et al.
Unique amongst them is the long history of attacks against Israel. Also
unique is the excessive propensity to delegitimize Israel. Delegitimized by
apparently unassociated groups. What's in it for these groups?
There's no organization calling for divestment from Arab nations and
companies. There's no movement condemning the culture of violence in the
Middle East. Blunt alliances existed in the past yet there's no debate
addressing this. This pattern supports one side of the equation only.
Take it to the extreme to see the unconcious mind. All affirmations are
affirmations of loyalty to a group. Criticism of anything means alignment
with something else. Loyalty is to an authority who's rhetoric and fashion
are then adopted. Conciously or unconciously we affirm our loyalty.
What's the authority that these varied Israel opponents follow? How can
they ignore the history of the region?
Where did this voice of contradiction come from as it overlooks the
incessant Arab attacks on Israelis? Decade after decade of attacks
justified by 'explanations' which are adopted by movements and mainstream
entities including 'mainstream' religious groups. Unseen forces seem to
dictate the rhetoric because it continues endlessly.
These pretexts are so entrenched in the vernacular that even Israelis use
them for convenience. ie Occupation.
If you're attacked and you take land it is conceded land. Not occupied
land. Conceded territory. Territory won. As shown in the history of the
region or history at any point.
The Media is absent as 10,000 people are moved from their homes. You
wouldn't know anything of importance has been happening there if you accept
the MSM pov. You wouldn't know that there have been constant attacks
against Israelis during this paper cease-fire. From where do the media
editors get their queues? Once again, these varied voices are on the same
page, at the same time and in the same manner.
Why is Israel making, or being forced to make, another concession? Why
any concession? What concessions have been made from the Arabs in the
region? When the Arabs attack it's the Int'l Community insisting that the
conceded territory is returned to the Arabs as a 'peace' gesture. What
motivates the Int'l Group.
The reality is that this expulsion/diengagement is just another tool for the
Arab/Palestinians et al to kill. The 'Disengagement' is an affirmation of
the status quo. It doesn't address the aggressor therefore it's an insult
to the minority and a guarantee of brutality. It's abusive. It's a blunt
reinforcement of the existing status quo. What is the motive of this status
What's the Arab goal besides the killing of people? Is it to stop democracy
which threatens their power as it exists under the guise of religious law?
Or do their own people threaten them and are therefore diverted with a
cause? Casus belli.
As this 'Disengagement' continues Arab/Palestinian words are showing intent
blatantly. They will continue to attack as always. As always since
1948 (and before).
It's a myth that Arab/Palestinians have any interest in two states. They
voice their intent in every statement. Their aggression is
always cloaked in the most transparent deniability. There is always another
condition which is not met, according the Arab/Palestinians, therefore they
claim justification for a culture of violence. Yet with the
'Disengagement' they will acquire a seaport, a border with Eygpt and
possibly an airport from which to maintain their violent practice.
The 'Disengagement' is an affront to any reasonable conciousness.
Some say that Israel is removing the 'excuse' for Arab/P. attacks by no
longer 'occupying' Gaza et al. Hence they won't have to use restraint "if"
they are attacked again. Using the term "if" is absurd, bizarre and
contrived when addressing Arab aggression. You need look no further than
the 'ceasefire' attacks against Israel in the previous weeks and months.
You can give the adversary a new name every week (PLA, PLO, militants,
insurgents, refugees, etc. etc.). You can point to another faction
every month but the practitioners and the practice Are The Same.
Arab/Palestinian public relation statements are made for the media but the
statements are always contradicted by some 'seperate' faction. There is
always another faction who insist on cont'd murder under the guise of
resistance. So the reality of constant warfare continues in this
transparent but well promoted disguise. It couldn't be more obvious. It's
the same hegemony and the same people. The Same.
Note that Hamas terrorist leaders Mahmoud Zahar, Muhammed Shamaa, Abdel
Fatah Dukhan, Ismail Haniya, Said Siyam and Nizar Rayyan now appear in
modern green caps while trying to mimic a Western political movement.
The attacks will continue against Israelis. Sure as there will be more
restraints placed on Israel in the future. Civilians attacked, Bombings and
Missiles. Roadmaps, Accords and Peace Prizes. UN Declarations, Divestments
and more Agit Prop. The same. More and more attacks with explanations
supported by a chorus of witting and unwitting alliances.
At what point does the majority of the world's population recognize the
obvious? It's not a ghost, it's a paradigm.
-Kristiansen arafat /-prize premature /-attacks since oslo /-arafat nazis
hero husseini /-prfssrs agst arafat
-50 to 1 /-theologian pales.=not use term israel /-plesheth philistine
/-gaza centuries history /-brit mandate palestine home for jews -/search
free Palestine, 5,170,000 results:
Episcopalians, Lutheran, Presbyterians, et al:
-mufti aristocrat 1920 attack agst jews /-photos -tell children
/-documents /-pictures /-worldnet date article 'hero' /-search husseini
-muslim nation leader political and religious /-chrono conquest in name
-egypt chemist freed terror ties /-
-concern american ammo for pales.
-reuters reluctant use t
-israel gov documents disengage /-gunmen move wbank
-media list of non-terms
-hamas vows to fight israel aft diseng.
-women against neg press image isr
-original israel westbank gaza jordan /-league of nations brit-french
On the road to retirement? Check out MSN Life Events for advice on how to
get there! http://lifeevents.msn.com/category.aspx?cid=Retirement
More information about the Imc-beirut