[Imc-birmingham] Imc-birmingham Digest, Vol 61, Issue 5

[Mike D]

I am in favour.

Mike

> Send Imc-birmingham mailing list submissions to
> 	imc-birmingham at lists.indymedia.org
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> 	http://lists.indymedia.org/mailman/listinfo/imc-birmingham
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> 	imc-birmingham-request at lists.indymedia.org
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
> 	imc-birmingham-owner at lists.indymedia.org
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of Imc-birmingham digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
>    1. Re: AABA (phunkee at aktivix.org)
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Sat, 13 Sep 2008 00:28:12 +0100
> From: phunkee at aktivix.org
> Subject: Re: [Imc-birmingham] AABA
> To: "dougbrum at tiscali.co.uk" <dougbrum at tiscali.co.uk>,	Birmingham
> 	Indymedia <imc-birmingham at lists.indymedia.org>
> Message-ID: <1221262092.48cafb0c2640f at www.aktivix.org>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
>
> Quoting "dougbrum at tiscali.co.uk" <dougbrum at tiscali.co.uk>:
>
>> Comrades
>> Can I propoes that the Anti-Academies peice about Harbourne hills
>> rejection of ARK as the sponsor be put as a main feature in the
>> centre
>> column? It has been passed out to various media so it would be
>> good to
>> get it on before them.
>> D
>
> Normally we wouldn't translate an article straight into a feature.
>
> Middle column features normally consist of at least a couple of
> newswire posts.
> The disadvantage of this is our features aren't that dynamic, unless
> there's
> already some articles knocking around on the newswire that relate to
> it.
>
> Although in this case, cos it's a great scoop and thanks to open
> publishing it's
> gone up quicker than the mainstream media, perhaps we should
> reconsider the our
> feature process?
>
> I know bristol imc for example don't wait around for articles to be
> generated,
> and they've got a very high turn around on features and they're
> pretty high
> quality.
>
> I'm up for relaxing this process, in favour of getting more features
> up on the
> middle column.
>
> What do other people reckon?
>
> So solid.
>
> phunkee
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> Imc-birmingham mailing list
> Imc-birmingham at lists.indymedia.org
> http://lists.indymedia.org/mailman/listinfo/imc-birmingham
>
>
> End of Imc-birmingham Digest, Vol 61, Issue 5
> *********************************************
>