[Imc-birmingham] AABA

[dougbrum at tiscali.co.uk]

Here is a better version to put on the page. I have included a little 
on the Wembley land occupation as well to tie it in with previous 
indymedia articles. 
D

>----Original Message----
>From: shiar at riseup.net
>Date: 14/09/2008 13:20 
>To: "Birmingham Indymedia"<imc-birmingham at lists.indymedia.org>
>Subj: Re: [Imc-birmingham] AABA
>
>
>On Fri, September 12, 2008 4:28 pm, phunkee at aktivix.org wrote:
>> I know bristol imc for example don't wait around for articles to be
>> generated,
>> and they've got a very high turn around on features and they're 
pretty
>> high
>> quality.
>>
>> I'm up for relaxing this process, in favour of getting more 
features up on
>> the
>> middle column.
>>
>> What do other people reckon?
>
>Me too.. although there's the danger that people will start proposing
>single articles as features, meaning that features might gradually 
become
>less collective and not reflecting the newswire.
>
>My own take is to set a sort of criteria for these *exceptions* and 
make
>that clear to people. Something like: original article/scoop on an
>important and  urgent issue (political, social struggle etc.)...
>
>-- 
>Shiar
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Imc-birmingham mailing list
>Imc-birmingham at lists.indymedia.org
>http://lists.indymedia.org/mailman/listinfo/imc-birmingham
>





How safe is your email? - http://www.tiscali.co.uk/products/securemail
__________________________________________________________
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: AABA indymedia.doc
Type: application/msword
Size: 30208 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.indymedia.org/pipermail/imc-birmingham/attachments/20080915/d47f4eda/attachment.doc