[Imc-birmingham] Imc-birmingham Digest, Vol 65, Issue 1

Mon Feb 2 12:46:10 PST 2009

Cannot see any problem with signing this.

Solid

Mike

> Send Imc-birmingham mailing list submissions to
> 	imc-birmingham at lists.indymedia.org
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> 	http://lists.indymedia.org/mailman/listinfo/imc-birmingham
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> 	imc-birmingham-request at lists.indymedia.org
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
> 	imc-birmingham-owner at lists.indymedia.org
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of Imc-birmingham digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
>    1. [Fwd: Re: [Imc-uk-process] Support letter to	indymedia
>       researchers] (phunkee)
>    2. Re: [Fwd: Re: [Imc-uk-process] Support letter	to	indymedia
>       researchers] (dougbrum at tiscali.co.uk)
>    3. Re: [Fwd: Re: [Imc-uk-process] Support letter	to indymedia
>       researchers] (phunkee)
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Mon, 02 Feb 2009 13:23:11 +0000
> From: phunkee <phunkee at aktivix.org>
> Subject: [Imc-birmingham] [Fwd: Re: [Imc-uk-process] Support letter
> to
> 	indymedia researchers]
> To: Birmingham Indymedia <imc-birmingham at lists.indymedia.org>
> Message-ID: <4986F3BF.40300 at aktivix.org>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed
>
> Should we sign this too?
>
> -------- Original Message --------
> Subject: 	Re: [Imc-uk-process] Support letter to indymedia
> researchers
> Date: 	Mon, 2 Feb 2009 05:08:46 -0800 (PST)
> From: 	sytaffel at riseup.net
> To: 	imc-uk-process at lists.indymedia.org
> References: 	<6B7A938A-ED8E-11DD-A946-000A27D762B8 at syndicate.org.uk>
> <behindthemask.1233305762.squirrel at swift.riseup.net>
>
>
>
> Hi
>
> We've put this round the Bristol list and we would also like to sign
> it.
> Similarly to Notts... If you need any extra help just ask and we'll
> see
> what we can do...
>
> Cheers
>
> Sy
>
>> Hi
>>
>>> Actually, would any of the other collectives in the network also
>>> consider sign it?
>>
>> I've put this round the Notts collective and we'd like to sign it.
>>
>> Thanks for the work that people are putting into this and please
>> let our
>> collective know if you need extra support.
>>
>> Cheers
>> BTM
>>
>>> ===============
>>>
>>>
>>> Template for indymedia researchers
>>>
>>> Subject: Indymedia Server Seized in the UK
>>>
>>> Dear Indymedia-Researchers
>>>
>>> Last Thursday, an Indymedia Server was seized by the police in
>>> Manchester, UK. This is not the first time that Indymedia Servers
>>> were
>>> seized in the UK. Some of you might remember the first case in
>>> 2004,
>>> when a main Indymedia server was seized in an operation which
>>> involved
>>> International law, an Italian Judge, an American District Court
>>> and the
>>> FBI.
>>>
>>> The loss of a server represents a serious damage to the
>>> infrastructure
>>> of the global indymedia project as well as the local grassroots
>>> social
>>> movements. It is ressource-intensive resource-intensive to
>>> replace a
>>> server both financially and time-wise. On the other hand, such
>>> incidents can raise public attention to issues like civil
>>> liberties and
>>> free speech, data-retention laws and also to the work of
>>> alternative
>>> media projects.
>>>
>>> Indymedia UK is collecting statements of support to publish on
>>> its
>>> website, and to use in press releases ? about the value of the
>>> project,
>>> or about the political implications of the recent server seizure.
>>>
>>> We are approaching you because you have published on indymedia in
>>> the
>>> past ? from political, cultural, or media- and communication
>>> angles,
>>> sometimes supportive, sometimes more critically. Sometimes we
>>> have
>>> cooperated with you, sometimes we made your live difficult. Some
>>> of you
>>> have been involved in indymedia collectives yourselves.
>>>
>>> If the recent server seizure corresponds with your work on
>>> alternative
>>> media / social movements / ICT / civil liberties, and if you want
>>> to
>>> support Indymedia, we would be happy to receive a statement of
>>> support
>>> from you.
>>>
>>> The details about the most recent server seizure are in an
>>> indymedia uk
>>> report
>>> www.indymedia.org.uk/en/2009/01/419838....,
>>> in a dedicated info page
>>> www.indymedia.org.uk/en/2009/01/420278....
>>> and in the attached press release.
>>> You can send a statement of support to the privately archived
>>> mailing
>>> list
>>> imc-uk-contact at lists.indymedia.org,
>>> or reply directly to this mail.
>>>
>>> best greetings
>>> IMC UK Press Group
>>>
>>>
>>> __
>>> Imc-uk-process mailing list
>>> Imc-uk-process at lists.indymedia.org
>>> http://lists.indymedia.org/mailman/listinfo/imc-uk-process
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> __
>> Imc-uk-process mailing list
>> Imc-uk-process at lists.indymedia.org
>> http://lists.indymedia.org/mailman/listinfo/imc-uk-process
>>
>
>
>
> __
> Imc-uk-process mailing list
> Imc-uk-process at lists.indymedia.org
> http://lists.indymedia.org/mailman/listinfo/imc-uk-process
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 2
> Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2009 14:27:18 +0100 (GMT+01:00)
> From: "dougbrum at tiscali.co.uk" <dougbrum at tiscali.co.uk>
> Subject: Re: [Imc-birmingham] [Fwd: Re: [Imc-uk-process] Support
> 	letter	to	indymedia researchers]
> To: <imc-birmingham at lists.indymedia.org>
> Message-ID:
> <23281445.1233581238024.JavaMail.root at ps37.mc.tiscali.sys>
> Content-Type: text/plain;charset="UTF-8"
>
>
> I vote to sign.
> D
>>----Original Message----
>>From: phunkee at aktivix.org
>>Date: 02/02/2009 13:23
>>To: "Birmingham Indymedia"<imc-birmingham at lists.indymedia.org>
>>Subj: [Imc-birmingham] [Fwd: Re: [Imc-uk-process] Support letter
>> to
> indymedia researchers]
>>
>>Should we sign this too?
>>
>>-------- Original Message --------
>>Subject: 	Re: [Imc-uk-process] Support letter to indymedia
> researchers
>>Date: 	Mon, 2 Feb 2009 05:08:46 -0800 (PST)
>>From: 	sytaffel at riseup.net
>>To: 	imc-uk-process at lists.indymedia.org
>>References:
>> 	<6B7A938A-ED8E-11DD-A946-000A27D762B8 at syndicate.org.uk>
>><behindthemask.1233305762.squirrel at swift.riseup.net>
>>
>>
>>
>>Hi
>>
>>We've put this round the Bristol list and we would also like to
>> sign
> it.
>>Similarly to Notts... If you need any extra help just ask and we'll
> see
>>what we can do...
>>
>>Cheers
>>
>>Sy
>>
>>> Hi
>>>
>>>> Actually, would any of the other collectives in the network also
>>>> consider sign it?
>>>
>>> I've put this round the Notts collective and we'd like to sign
>>> it.
>>>
>>> Thanks for the work that people are putting into this and please
> let our
>>> collective know if you need extra support.
>>>
>>> Cheers
>>> BTM
>>>
>>>> ===============
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Template for indymedia researchers
>>>>
>>>> Subject: Indymedia Server Seized in the UK
>>>>
>>>> Dear Indymedia-Researchers
>>>>
>>>> Last Thursday, an Indymedia Server was seized by the police in
>>>> Manchester, UK. This is not the first time that Indymedia
>>>> Servers
> were
>>>> seized in the UK. Some of you might remember the first case in
> 2004,
>>>> when a main Indymedia server was seized in an operation which
> involved
>>>> International law, an Italian Judge, an American District Court
> and the
>>>> FBI.
>>>>
>>>> The loss of a server represents a serious damage to the
> infrastructure
>>>> of the global indymedia project as well as the local grassroots
> social
>>>> movements. It is ressource-intensive resource-intensive to
>>>> replace
> a
>>>> server both financially and time-wise. On the other hand, such
>>>> incidents can raise public attention to issues like civil
> liberties and
>>>> free speech, data-retention laws and also to the work of
> alternative
>>>> media projects.
>>>>
>>>> Indymedia UK is collecting statements of support to publish on
>>>> its
>>>> website, and to use in press releases ? about the value of the
> project,
>>>> or about the political implications of the recent server
>>>> seizure.
>>>>
>>>> We are approaching you because you have published on indymedia
>>>> in
> the
>>>> past ? from political, cultural, or media- and communication
> angles,
>>>> sometimes supportive, sometimes more critically. Sometimes we
>>>> have
>>>> cooperated with you, sometimes we made your live difficult. Some
> of you
>>>> have been involved in indymedia collectives yourselves.
>>>>
>>>> If the recent server seizure corresponds with your work on
> alternative
>>>> media / social movements / ICT / civil liberties, and if you
>>>> want
> to
>>>> support Indymedia, we would be happy to receive a statement of
> support
>>>> from you.
>>>>
>>>> The details about the most recent server seizure are in an
> indymedia uk
>>>> report
>>>> www.indymedia.org.uk/en/2009/01/419838....,
>>>> in a dedicated info page
>>>> www.indymedia.org.uk/en/2009/01/420278....
>>>> and in the attached press release.
>>>> You can send a statement of support to the privately archived
> mailing
>>>> list
>>>> imc-uk-contact at lists.indymedia.org,
>>>> or reply directly to this mail.
>>>>
>>>> best greetings
>>>> IMC UK Press Group
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> __
>>>> Imc-uk-process mailing list
>>>> Imc-uk-process at lists.indymedia.org
>>>> http://lists.indymedia.org/mailman/listinfo/imc-uk-process
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> __
>>> Imc-uk-process mailing list
>>> Imc-uk-process at lists.indymedia.org
>>> http://lists.indymedia.org/mailman/listinfo/imc-uk-process
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>>__
>>Imc-uk-process mailing list
>>Imc-uk-process at lists.indymedia.org
>>http://lists.indymedia.org/mailman/listinfo/imc-uk-process
>>
>>_______________________________________________
>>Imc-birmingham mailing list
>>Imc-birmingham at lists.indymedia.org
>>http://lists.indymedia.org/mailman/listinfo/imc-birmingham
>>
>
>
>
>
>
> Get 50% off an online download of Norton Security 2009 only from
> Tiscali - http://www.tiscali.co.uk/security
> ___________________________________________________
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 3
> Date: Mon, 02 Feb 2009 16:06:41 +0000
> From: phunkee <phunkee at aktivix.org>
> Subject: Re: [Imc-birmingham] [Fwd: Re: [Imc-uk-process] Support
> 	letter	to indymedia researchers]
> To: Birmingham Indymedia <imc-birmingham at lists.indymedia.org>
> Message-ID: <49871A11.5050806 at aktivix.org>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
>
> dougbrum at tiscali.co.uk wrote:
>> I vote to sign.
>> D
>>
> Cool, I've informed them via the imc-process list that we want to
> sign too.
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> Imc-birmingham mailing list
> Imc-birmingham at lists.indymedia.org
> http://lists.indymedia.org/mailman/listinfo/imc-birmingham
>
>
> End of Imc-birmingham Digest, Vol 65, Issue 1
> *********************************************
>