[Imc-communication] Imc-belgium block of german RENEWED PROPOSAL (Belgium-Case)

[andrés]

Let's try again :) :

han at indymedia.be dijo el 06/06/2005 9:42:
> Summary:
> 
> We don't think taking away the url of an existing working IMC collective
> is a good idea. IMC is a diverse network. In the very small space of
> Belgium there are several views on what indymedia can or should be. This
> is not necessarily a problem. It seems obvious for us that a new project
> starts looking for a new url. There are several good options which are
> all showing that they are also working on a national level as seems to
> be their ambition. (be.indymedia.org, belgique.indymedia.org,
> belgie.indymedia.org, ...)

Just to try to address this main point summarised by han here:

1. is there any way that the network could attempt to _guarantee_ to 
indy.be that, accepting the german proposal, if a process of 
negotiation/mediation amongst the belgian imcs were to reach no final 
agreement (within a time limit), then the belgium.indymedia.org would 
anyway be automatically returned to them?

2. is there any way that, if indy.be were to show itself willing to make 
this *first* step towards entering into a genuine process of 
negotiation/mediation amongst the belgian imcs, the other belgian imcs, 
also accepting the german proposal, would be prepared *also*, for their 
part, to declare and show themselves willing to enter into such a 
process in a spirit of good will, genuinely _willing_ to seek out and 
achieve some way to at least "coexist" or even reach a "rapprochement"?

--> I'm looking for answers here from *all* of the belgian imcs, as well 
as the rest of the network.

-- 
andrés