[Imc-communication] Clarification about current process on imc-process

[gek at linefeed.org]

> All decisions agreed or blocked on the imc-process list are by 
> collective liaisons. If you are speaking as a liaison you should send 
> these remarks to the imc-process list. What lots of people will ask 
> themselves then will be why then the SF collective did not block the 
> Germany Proposal ?

Personally, no one from my collective has the time to sort through
dozens of messages every day on process and communication to keep up
-- which is why, in the past, lengthy several-month deadlines were
assigned so that local IMCs had time to dissect what was going on.
This is part of the reason to have facilitation on the imc-process
list.

The last I saw was that there was a block of the IMC Germany proposal.
I missed the part where this block was ruled irrelevant.

> Take a close look at the "Belgium" attempt to block, to the reasons they 
> invoke for it and tell us if you really think some of them show a real 
> respect for any other collective among the network ? some do not even 

I am not interested in participating in the Belgian soap opera. I only
know people involved through the internet. Asking me to dislike
someone when I don't really know you or them is just pointless.

> Well if your collective whishes to engage in such a proposal, as you 
> suggest, then do it.
> It just will be a real shame in my own individual point of view.

My problem at this point is that imc-process has authorized a
controversial change through sloppy process. This is not good for
anyone involved, no matter if they got what they wanted or not.
-gek/sfimc