[Imc-communication] Clarification about current process on imc-process
apb at swissmail.org
Fri Jun 24 18:05:26 PDT 2005
gek at linefeed.org dijo el 25/06/2005 1:24:
> My problem at this point is that imc-process has authorized a
> controversial change through sloppy process. This is not good for
> anyone involved, no matter if they got what they wanted or not.
You may be mistaken, gek. Your comments arrive late. Many concerned
imc'istas have long been doing their best to work towards (still an
ongoing process) good workable solutions to the longstanding belgian
In spite of inevitable (creative) friction, both imc-process and
imc-communication, imho, have so far served us all well. If anyone may
possibly be accused of sloppiness, perhaps it would be precisely those
collectives which choose not to dedicate enough or even any time at all
to participating effectively in global network affairs.
To simply do nothing, or to block, to ignore or to deny, is always easy,
too easy. To attempt to listen, to understand and to offer more
creative, more imaginative alternatives, to engage and to debate, costs
more effort and more time.
It is of course (almost always) worth the effort.
More information about the IMC-communication