[Imc-communication] Clarification about current process on imc-process

[andrés]

gek at linefeed.org dijo el 25/06/2005 1:24:

> My problem at this point is that imc-process has authorized a
> controversial change through sloppy process. This is not good for
> anyone involved, no matter if they got what they wanted or not.
> -gek/sfimc

You may be mistaken, gek. Your comments arrive late. Many concerned 
imc'istas have long been doing their best to work towards (still an 
ongoing process) good workable solutions to the longstanding belgian 
problem.

In spite of inevitable (creative) friction, both imc-process and 
imc-communication, imho, have so far served us all well. If anyone may 
possibly be accused of sloppiness, perhaps it would be precisely those 
collectives which choose not to dedicate enough or even any time at all 
to participating effectively in global network affairs.

To simply do nothing, or to block, to ignore or to deny, is always easy, 
too easy. To attempt to listen, to understand and to offer more 
creative, more imaginative alternatives, to engage and to debate, costs 
more effort and more time.

It is of course (almost always) worth the effort.

-- 
andrés, imc-canarias