[Imc-communication] Statement by the Cleveland.Indymedia Collective on the Belgium Situation

[Claudio]

Phil wrote:

Congratulations. From the people from outside indymedia taking part on
the discution you are the loudest.

You ask for respect but youself don't seem to respect people or imc's
not following your thinking.

> The constant accusations of supporting a red smearing is an offense to
> all imcs involved in the support for the former dissafilliation demand.

Putting McCarty-like blacklists online with no proof at all, does it fit
the picture?

Maybe in good faith you missed my answer here:
http://lists.indymedia.org/pipermail/imc-communication/2005-June/0612-iq.html

> In this statement Cleveland does not refer to the numerous elements of
> proofs given inbetween coroborating facts that the belgium collective
> does not follow this guidelines, functioning almost like a private
> information agency, using arbitrary and variable editorial policy and
> decision making, and no matter its color, controled by a single
> political party.

See our answers to your allegations. Because you say so, it doesn't make
so. We have been really open on our vision and where we want to go as a
collective. Please stop the hysteria.


Greetings,

Claudio, indymedia.be