[Imc-communication] Re: belgium: two questions to answer

[clara]

hi,
my example was not given as a reason to dissaffiliate indy.be, but only
reaction to Han's reaction on Ionnek's analysis: on the statement that
only spam and double postings are hidden.

please bear in mind, that the disaffiliation of indy.be has been blocked
long ago, and that people put time and effort into moving towards steps
to solve the conflict.

Please all of you who suddenly started a discussion about why indy.be
should not be disaffiliated, please don't act as if nothing had happened
in between, as if that proposal was still open, and let's move forward
to solve this conflict instead.

love and solidarity
clara

nick wrote:
>>imc-process does not have an answer for either of these. Look at the
> 
> original disaffiliation proposal and then read indy.be's response to
> it -- is that enough 'evidence' for you, sitting in Houston (or wherever
> you might be these days)? Given that even the US Justice System gives
> the accused the benefit of the doubt, is there enough there to
> convince you that indy.be is evil and must be punished?
> 
> no, I never even said my answer to the questions, but as to #1, I am
> certainly not convinced of anything.  I am open to being convinced,
> but as of yet, no way.  But you didn't answer #2, and I think my
> answer is yes to that one.
> 
> peace
> Nick
> 
> On 6/28/05, gek <gek at linefeed.org> wrote:
> 
>>>1) Was there a repeated violation of a Principle of Unity?
>>>2) Is a national-named-imc having extreme problems working with its
>>
>>imc-process does not have an answer for either of these. Look at the
>>original disaffiliation proposal and then read indy.be's response to
>>it -- is that enough 'evidence' for you, sitting in Houston (or wherever
>>you might be these days)? Given that even the US Justice System gives
>>the accused the benefit of the doubt, is there enough there to
>>convince you that indy.be is evil and must be punished?
>>
>>Or maybe we don't go by evidence anyway and we just rely on mobocracy
>>-- whoever can whip up enough gossip on irc or global email lists is 
>>the winner?
>>
>>I have no doubt that there are people in Belgium who cannot work
>>together and they all need to find a way to work on Indymedia near
>>each other. That happens. But I am hesitant (and so should the network)
>>of taking action which is punitive or vengeful on behalf of one side
>>against the other. 
>>
>>-gek/sfimc
>>
>>
>>
>>_______________________________________________
>>IMC-communication mailing list
>>IMC-communication at lists.indymedia.org
>>http://lists.indymedia.org/mailman/listinfo/imc-communication
>>
> 
> 
>