[Imc-communication] (no subject)

[mp]

hi,

On Tue, 2005-06-28 at 10:55 -0700, deva wrote:
> For example, if you have a troublemaker in your collective, you could
> never get rid of that person because they would always block every
> proposal to ban them. This is so self evident and obvious, that it
> needs no proposal to 'officially' establish.

agree, but perhaps there ought to be a provision for "the accused" speak
or say hold on for a second here - or something, - since what else are
witch hunts than a consensus of someone over someone else? ;)

-mp