[Imc-communication] "Mediation" RE Germany's Belgium proposal
zcat at ametrika.com
zcat at ametrika.com
Sun May 29 12:01:15 PDT 2005
hello / hola :)
I for 1 agree that the belgium imc should for all imc's in belgium - a
portal like the UK-imc is for the collectives here they all partake in the
running of the uk site and link from/to it.
They equally help each other and people who put up barracades to other imc's
are not working within the spirit of Indymedia.
Hey no one said this world is fair but fsck that , thats why we are here to
trey and bring a bit of fairness and equallity to the world.
I really think that for one collective to hold that name is wrong when there
is more than one imc in the country.
what is so hard about changing the name to that local area? They cannot
speak as indymedias of the other areas.
some quotes i like and strongly agree with.
"to me lokal is before national/state, the base before the big"
"if it is called belgium, the center column has to be from all belgium
people that collaborate in indymedia"
"If no consesus can be reached than this url shouldnt be used"
> i agree
> i think that germany proposal for mediation on belgium is a good way
> sorry that imc-barcelona didn't involve in this but its really difficult to explain dozens of emails or decide something from the distance
> how many hours to be able to make it well? how many transllations of emails?
> a personal opinion on the subject:
> none imc should have a country or area subdomine if part of that area doesn't agree
> as for example, barcelona and spain
> if an imc-spain was created, imc-barcelona will not agree that it will sindicate its news there (it is not decided in assembly because we didn't need it but i think it will be consesous)
> to understand this you need to know qite a bit of lokal history that i am not explaining here because the length :)
> it is not the same but to me lokal is before national/state, the base before the big
> also it is important that in lokal areas we interatuate among the diferent reallities
> because of that imc-belgium people could integrate in the different lokal subgroups.
> difficult if now they don't have good relation but important in the growning up in madurity of sharing with different reallityes.
> if it is called belgium, the center column has to be from all belgium people that collaborate in indymedia, if not i has not sense to be called like that. if not, it is not an horizontal media.
> salhaun talking as individual
> On Sun, 29 May 2005 07:25:57 -0700 (PDT)
> pina at riseup.net wrote:
>> > There is also the thorny question of what happens to the URL in regards
>> > to the Germany proposal if the mediator is unsuccessful in bringing the
>> > parties to an agreement. Since the "neutralization" is supposed to be
>> > only for the purpose of facilitating the mediation, in that event the
>> > URL would revert to its previous condition. Is this correct?
>> I dont know what is gonna happing, but i think that the decision should
>> came from a consensus, and should envolve *every* local collective in
>> belgium. If no consesus can be reached than this url shouldnt be use.
>> in solidarity
>> IMC-communication mailing list
>> IMC-communication at lists.indymedia.org
> IMC-communication mailing list
> IMC-communication at lists.indymedia.org
Fortunatly, somwhere between chance and mystery lies imagination,
the only thing that protects our freedom, despite the fact that
people keep trying to reduce it or kill it altogether.
"We consider Internet Explorer (IE) to be a broken web browser"-riseup.net
"I consider internet explorer a peiece of worthless dogshit" - zcat
More information about the IMC-communication