[Imc-communication] VA BEACH disaffiliation

[eric]

eric from big muddy here,
disaffiliation would appear appropriate for incorporation and other 
indiscretions it appears this fellow jim has embarked upon.
As to also taking legal action, that seems somewhat punitive for its own 
sake. There was obviously a lapse in process. however oversight was 
obviously somewhat lax. This type of incident is bound to happen in a polity 
such as ours. Obviously, all should be done to prevent another such incident 
from occurring but a major concern is that barriers not  be created because 
of this that will actually impede the formation of other imcs.
best
eric
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Jay" <idiot at jaysand.com>
To: <imc-communication at lists.indymedia.org>; "niel oscar" <wolfe at riseup.net>
Sent: Saturday, June 03, 2006 5:45 PM
Subject: Re: [Imc-communication] VA BEACH disaffiliation


> Hi Niel,
>
> At 6/1/2006, you wrote:
> >For those of you in the dark since it appears that some of the context of
> >this
> >thread appear to have taken place on 'new imc' the history of this can be
> >found here ....
> >
> >http://lists.indymedia.org/pipermail/new-imc/2006-May/0507-gs.html
> >
> >There is a very important item in this that has not been touch on...
> >
> >"... Since that date, the following facts have become clear:
> >-- Jim has registered the Virginia Beach IMC as a for-profit corporation 
> >in
> >the State of Virginia, clearly violating the principles of unity.... "
> >
> >First, I'd like to see confirmation that 'Jim' has registered VA as a for
> >profit organization,
>
> That information exists, unfortunately.  There is registration information
> available from the Virginia State Corporation Commission.  I can send it
> along to any of you privately if you like, but I'd rather not get into
> putting too much "evidence" on the public lists, just because I think 
> doing
> that may be overkill.  If need be, it's available.
>
> >and second if proof is found/provided legal action taken
> >against him.
>
> I haven't thought anything about this part of it.  I don't know what, if
> anything, indymedia could or should do about this kind of stuff.  Maybe
> it's something for imc-legal to discuss.
> Jay
>
>
> >I know that some of you may find it odd that I am the one pointing this 
> >out,
> >(re: old paid volunteer debate) but to me this is a separate issue and we
> >must act otherwise this will continue to be an on-going problem.
> >
> >Dan 'Wolfe' Foscarini
> >Vancouver IMC
> >_______________________________________________
> >IMC-communication mailing list
> >IMC-communication at lists.indymedia.org
> >http://lists.indymedia.org/mailman/listinfo/imc-communication
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> IMC-communication mailing list
> IMC-communication at lists.indymedia.org
> http://lists.indymedia.org/mailman/listinfo/imc-communication
>
>
> -- 
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> Version: 7.1.394 / Virus Database: 268.8.1/355 - Release Date: 6/2/2006
>
>