[Imc-communication] VIRGINIA BEACH (disaffiliation, decision deadline June 6, 15:00 GMT)

[Jay]

Great.  I just re-submitted the proposal to the imc-process list with a 
decision deadline of June 20.

At 5/31/2006, you wrote:
>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>Hash: SHA1
>
>Hey Jay,
>
>Jay wrote:
>[..]
> > But, like I said above, one week does seem too short for
> > disaffiliation.  I set that because it's the standard deadline period
> > for a new-imc and I didn't give it much thought, especially because this
> > seemed like a situation that made sense for us to deal with primarily in
> > the new-imc working group (more about that in my next e-mail).
>
>I'm glad you're proposing this extension.
>
>I wouldn't - at all - oppose a one week deadline if it was a new-imc
>decision that is being made. However, from what I understand, this IMC
>had already passed the process and thus only imc process can
>disaffiliate it which -to me- means that its decision deadlines need to
>apply. And these have usually been longer than a week in the past for
>the reasons given by others before on this thread.
>
> > What do you think about our extending the deadline to three weeks,
> > meaning to June 20?  Certainly if Jim appears and has anything to say we
> > should be even more flexible about the deadline.
>
>Personally, I think that's a reasonable schedule.
>
>Thank you for all your hard and enduring work for new-imc, Jay, Nick,
>and all the others taking part in it.
>
>Alster
>- --
>GPG key
>http://keys.indymedia.org/cgi-bin/lookup?op=get&search=05059C17
>Fingerprint    1B8B 128F 8435 541C B3A5 1B7E CF5A 9D55 0505 9C17
>All other      http://docs.indymedia.org/view/Main/AlsteR
>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
>Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux)
>
>iD8DBQFEfc2gz1qdVQUFnBcRAulLAJ435DJU4iLtr/N4p8Q6Z4cCAOAQpQCgqI5g
>Zhisi6jZkmc42i5XtgOe+lA=
>=7C/C
>-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----