[Imc-communication] ongoing defamation of me using indymedia resources.

[Cameron Gregg]

remid at riseup.net wrote:
> Anna <anna at mail.nadir.org> a écrit:
>> we are having four emails by Mick who are replies to what Cameron cc'd
>> to imc-communication. Mick isn't subscribed and so i have to decide
>> whether to let them through to the list. i prefer to not make that
>> decision alone. should they be accepted?
> 
> Hi !
> 
> 
> We discuss about this question during our last collective meeting.
> We did not produce any collective text, but we reached a consensus on  
> the following thoughts (That's means that the formulation is personal,  
> but the thoughts are collectives): We do not expect nothing  
> interessent from the Mick answers but as theses pending requests are  
> answers to a mail that is passed on imc-communication, we think that  
> theses « answers » have to be on this list too.
> 
> 
> Rémi for the imc paris collective.

Hi,

You can read Mick's responses on the imc-darwin list, as they were CC'd 
there.

Have a look down the bottom of the page here:

http://lists.indymedia.org/pipermail/imc-darwin/2006-October/date.html


You will notice I have further responses to mick, but I only posted them 
to the imc-darwin list.

Instead of bringing discussion to imc-communication, perhaps people from 
around the planet could join the imc-darwin list, and help sort this 
dispute out.

There has been talk on various lists over the past year about building a 
workable conflict resolution process within the network. Perhaps this 
could be a start.

Cameron

Sydney IMC