[Imc-communication] [IMC-Tech] proposal to imc-process

[mat(a)riseup.net]

http://www.ntimc.org/ is up and running
http://wvl.indymedia.org/ is up and running.

These two sites are not being updated, but still online for archive
purposes.
My opinion is that should not be taken off the cities list.

Mat
CMI Buenos Aires
Indymedia Argentina

> -----Mensaje original-----
> De: imc-tech-bounces at lists.indymedia.org 
> [mailto:imc-tech-bounces at lists.indymedia.org] En nombre de ben
> Enviado el: Miércoles, 13 de Junio de 2007 19:39
> Para: imc-tech at lists.indymedia.org; 
> imc-communication at lists.indymedia.org
> Asunto: Re: [IMC-Tech] proposal to imc-process
> 
> I should have double checked that last list. I originally 
> found over a dozen dead imc links in cities.inc by manually 
> going through them but I couldn't face going through the 50 
> sites in the USA or the similar number of european sites so I 
> used an online link validator and didn't double check the results.
> 
> After the replies to the previous list there is clearer 
> status on some...
> 
> video.indymedia.org - now accepting uploads after problem 
> being noticed radio.indymedia.org - website is dead but 
> server was used for g8 streaming boston.indymedia.org - down 
> at time of test, now up again and fine kenya.indymedia.org - 
> off but apparently coming back really soon www.stlimc.org - 
> no editorial features, collective reorganizing 
> hamilton.indymedia.org - closed to publishing but perhaps to 
> return melbourne.indymedia.org - publishing suspended, but 
> perhaps to return bc.indymedia.org / victoria.indymedia.org - 
> off for now, may relaunch ontario.indymedia.org - 8 months of 
> downtime. up now, just very slow or timing out. only spam in 
> newswire this year.
> 
> These can all be assumed to be coming back and it would be 
> great to hear anything people know about the rest of them...
> 
> The revised list has 27 sites (out of about 180) which seem 
> to be dead, broken, hacked or closed.
> 
> http://nigeria.indymedia.org/
> http://montreal.indymedia.org/
> http://burma.indymedia.org/
> http://india.indymedia.org/
> http://armenia.indymedia.org/
> http://darwin.indymedia.org/
> http://brisbane.indymedia.org/
> http://croatia.indymedia.org/
> http://belgrade.indymedia.org/
> http://winnipeg.indymedia.org
> http://belgrade.indymedia.org
> http://chilesur.indymedia.org
> http://bigmuddyimc.org/
> http://idaho.indymedia.org/
> http://ithaca.indymedia.org/
> http://madison.indymedia.org/
> http://www.ntimc.org/
> http://tallahassee.indymedia.org/
> http://tampabay.indymedia.org
> http://vermont.indymedia.org/
> http://wvl.indymedia.org/
> http://biotech.indymedia.org/
> http://tnimc.org/ (forbiden)
> http://detriot.org/ (hacked?)
> http://mumbai.indymedia.org/ (hacked?)
> http://beirut.indymedia.org/ (collective desolved a few months ago)
> http://process.indymedia.org/faq.php3 (long gone)
> 
> That's almost 1 in 6 links in the cities.inc apparently dead 
> (and there are almost certainly others which are working 
> sites but with no active collective anymore). So, I still 
> would like to see a proposal go to process with the aim of 
> weeding out whatever sites continue to dead or closed.
> 
> Ben
> 
> 
> On Wed, June 13, 2007 11:00 am, John Milton wrote:
> > quebec,  worcester, boston, stlimc, and winnipeg are also up... 
> > suggest that Ben's proposal be not actiioned right now 
> until further 
> > checked out
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> imc-tech mailing list
> imc-tech at lists.indymedia.org
> http://lists.indymedia.org/mailman/listinfo/imc-tech
>