[Imc-communication] [IMC-Tech] proposal to imc-process

[toya]

mumbai.indymedia.org 
isnt hacked  is also in a server in brasil 

we are thinking of putting it on our new server together with 
chilesur.indymedia.org   
and
india.indymedia.org

chilesur and india as i said already with the publish closed but is
there for navegation propose - the both collective asked us (imc brasil
tech) to do it that way.

so we will probably have mumbai.indymedia.org working like that (for
navegation only) on our new server soon.

so they shouldnt be taken out of the city lists but as i said and other
ppl here have said too, we could put them on some special section for
this type of sites.

bye
toya




Em Wed, Jun 13, 2007 at 03:39:23PM -0700, ben escreveu:
> I should have double checked that last list. I originally found over a
> dozen dead imc links in cities.inc by manually going through them but I
> couldn't face going through the 50 sites in the USA or the similar number
> of european sites so I used an online link validator and didn't double
> check the results.
> 
> After the replies to the previous list there is clearer status on some...
> 
> video.indymedia.org - now accepting uploads after problem being noticed
> radio.indymedia.org - website is dead but server was used for g8 streaming
> boston.indymedia.org - down at time of test, now up again and fine
> kenya.indymedia.org - off but apparently coming back really soon
> www.stlimc.org - no editorial features, collective reorganizing
> hamilton.indymedia.org - closed to publishing but perhaps to return
> melbourne.indymedia.org - publishing suspended, but perhaps to return
> bc.indymedia.org / victoria.indymedia.org - off for now, may relaunch
> ontario.indymedia.org - 8 months of downtime. up now, just very slow or
> timing out. only spam in newswire this year.
> 
> These can all be assumed to be coming back and it would be great to hear
> anything people know about the rest of them...
> 
> The revised list has 27 sites (out of about 180) which seem to be dead,
> broken, hacked or closed.
> 
> http://nigeria.indymedia.org/
> http://montreal.indymedia.org/
> http://burma.indymedia.org/
> http://india.indymedia.org/
> http://armenia.indymedia.org/
> http://darwin.indymedia.org/
> http://brisbane.indymedia.org/
> http://croatia.indymedia.org/
> http://belgrade.indymedia.org/
> http://winnipeg.indymedia.org
> http://belgrade.indymedia.org
> http://chilesur.indymedia.org
> http://bigmuddyimc.org/
> http://idaho.indymedia.org/
> http://ithaca.indymedia.org/
> http://madison.indymedia.org/
> http://www.ntimc.org/
> http://tallahassee.indymedia.org/
> http://tampabay.indymedia.org
> http://vermont.indymedia.org/
> http://wvl.indymedia.org/
> http://biotech.indymedia.org/
> http://tnimc.org/ (forbiden)
> http://detriot.org/ (hacked?)
> http://mumbai.indymedia.org/ (hacked?)
> http://beirut.indymedia.org/ (collective desolved a few months ago)
> http://process.indymedia.org/faq.php3 (long gone)
> 
> That's almost 1 in 6 links in the cities.inc apparently dead (and there
> are almost certainly others which are working sites but with no active
> collective anymore). So, I still would like to see a proposal go to
> process with the aim of weeding out whatever sites continue to dead or
> closed.
> 
> Ben
> 
> 
> On Wed, June 13, 2007 11:00 am, John Milton wrote:
> > quebec,  worcester, boston, stlimc, and winnipeg are also up... suggest
> > that Ben's proposal be not actiioned right now until further checked out
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> IMC-communication mailing list
> IMC-communication at lists.indymedia.org
> http://lists.indymedia.org/mailman/listinfo/imc-communication

-- 
.....