[IMC-DC] BTL Q&A 5-9-05: Marcus Raskin on the Lessons from Vietnam War

[Scott Harris]

Between the Lines Q&A
A weekly column featuring progressive viewpoints
on national and international issues
under-reported in mainstream media
for release May 9, 2005
http://www.btlonline.org/btl051305.html

Distributed by Squeaky Wheel Productions
http://www.squeakywheel.net
==================================/b>

ANNOUNCEMENTS

George Orwell, author of ì1984î once said, ìSpeaking the truth in times
of universal deceit is a revolutionary act.î As we look at the Bush
administrationís actions over the past four years calculated to
misrepresent and distort the truth on so many issues, itís easy to
conclude that we indeed are living in the time of ìuniversal deceitî
Orwell described.

In exchange for your contribution, weíre offering a T-shirt with
Orwellís famous quote, as well as DVD film documentaries and audio CDs
featuring interviews with progressive activists and newsmakers. You can
see our list of premiums and donate online using PayPal. Or, you can
print our contribution form and mail in your contribution. Go to
http://www.squeakywheel.net


+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

CONNECTICUT LISTENERS, SAVE THIS DATE:

On the anniversary of the Watergate break-in,
Squeaky Wheel Productions presents
A film documentary by Globalvision

"Weapons of Mass Deception"
 and discussion/reception with
WMD film director Danny Schechter,
who assesses our post-journalism era in his talk
"How Our Media Undermines Democracy"

7 to 10 p.m.
Friday June 17
at the Unitarian Society of New Haven
700 Hartford Turnpike
Hamden, CT
Suggested donation: $15 RSVP
(203) 268-8446

+++++++++++++++++++++++++

BETWEEN THE LINES Q&A
for the week ending 5/13/05

Bush Administration, Peace Movement Learned
Very Different Lessons from Vietnam War

Interview with Marcus Raskin,
co-founder of the Institute for Policy Studies,
conducted by Scott Harris

Listen in RealAudio:
http://www.btlonline.org/raskin051305.ram
(Needs RealOne player or RealPlayer)

With the recent escalation of violence by insurgents in Iraq that
includes daily attacks on U.S. and Iraqi forces, car bombings and
kidnappings, the optimistic picture recently painted by White House and
Pentagon officials of diminishing violence, stability and a short-term
reduction in the number of American occupation troops seems ever more
implausible. Meanwhile, nations such as Italy and the Ukraine that had
initially deployed soldiers to support the Bush administration's
occupation of Iraq are now steadily withdrawing.

While differences outnumber similarities between the Iraq war and the
U.S. war in Vietnam, there are a growing number of observers who are
concerned that the Bush administration may be making the same critical
mistakes that led to the American defeat and withdrawal from South
Vietnam 30 years ago. Critics and supporters of Washington's war in
Southeast Asia, haunted by the deaths of 58,000 American troops and more
than a million Vietnamese, have drawn very different lessons from the
Vietnam conflict.

Between The Lines' Scott Harris spoke with Marcus Raskin, co-founder of
the Institute for Policy Studies in 1963, and a vocal opponent of the
Vietnam war and military draft. Raskin assesses the current peace
movement's demand for a rapid U.S. withdrawal from Iraq and the lessons
he believes should have been learned in Vietnam.

MARCUS RASKIN: Well, I think that if you look at the Vietnam War, there
was an election in September of 1967 in South Vietnam, and the
assumption in the press and among people in the administration was, "You
see, this election is working, and it will result in the stabilization
of the South Vietnamese government and everything is going to be hunky
dory."

The same sort of crude understanding of life of another culture is
happening in Iraq. There's nothing to suggest, at least at this point --
and there's nothing on the horizon to suggest that the attempt to have
an election or an election on top of what is now an incipient civil war
-- that it will result in any sort of quiet in allowing the United
States to leave.

Furthermore, though, there is in case no apparent reason the United
States will leave. It wants to have the bases in the Middle East; it
wants to be the nation that is able to guide where the oil is supposed
to go, etc. And it wants to establish itself directly as the nation that
has the sphere of influence over that area.

BETWEEN THE LINES: By all accounts, U.S. military recruitment is down,
and there are real prospects out there that a draft may be
re-established in this country soon. What do you think the response of
the peace movement who want a quick withdrawal of U.S. troops from the
occupation of Iraq -- what do you think the peace movement should be
doing now?

MARCUS RASKIN: I think that there are several things that should go on.
One is obviously the increase of marches and demonstrations, which I
think does have an effect. I think also, there is a core question of
legitimacy of the war -- that is to say, it's based on a lie. There were
no weapons of mass destruction, on and on. That the president had no
intention of following whatever the intelligence said -- that he and
(British Prime Minister Tony) Blair wanted to make war and planned to do
this several years ago. So that this was an aggressive war, that being
an aggressive war is something which is violative of the Nuremberg
principles which the United States supported as it related to German war
criminals.

Furthermore -- and that's just a part of an argument -- it strikes me as
mistaken in the extreme, not to raise the question of either censure or
impeachment with regard to the president and his Cabinet, and at least
the president in order to make clear that these people indeed have acted
in an unlawful way.

BETWEEN THE LINES: Just a final question, if I could. Many half-truths
and blatant lies were told in justifying the Iraq War on the part of the
Bush administration, but our government seems unaccountable for these
breaches of trust. In fact, policymakers have been rewarded with
promotions, medals and re-election. The press was blamed for the loss of
the Vietnam War by conservatives who supported that conflict, and it
seems that the press in the United States has been asleep at the switch,
to say the least, in terms of scrutinizing and challenging the
rationales for war in Iraq.

MARCUS RASKIN: Well, I think that's right, and for the most part, our
press is what you would call a palace court press. That is to say, it
takes handouts, and is more willing to take propaganda than doing
individual or critical research on various questions. It's a great
shame, because what that means is that the people of this country suffer
as a result of it.

This issue is going to become more and more important as people in any
case, move away from reading newspapers and dependent on the mass media,
such as television, which indeed, only tells a fleeting glimpse of any
story. So the country is faced with a very, very great problem now, in
terms of how news is gathered, how criticism is made and how it gets
out.

BETWEEN THE LINES: Any lessons you want to impart from you learned
during the Vietnam War in your activism against that conflict?

MARCUS RASKIN: I think that there's one principle, and that is less a
principle, I think, than a stand. And that is that unless you speak out
and act, the social and political space will close down. The only way to
keep open that social and political space is to use it.

Contact the Institute for Policy Studies by calling (202) 234-9382 or
visit their website at www.ips-dc.org. Raskin and Carl Lavan are the
editors of a new book titled, "In Democracy's Shadow: The Secret World
of National Security."


* "The Unreported Vietnam-Iraq Parallel," by Danny Schechter,
CommonDreams.org, May 1, 2005
* "From 'Gook' to 'Raghead'," by Bob Herbert, by the New York Times, May
2, 2005

Scott Harris is executive producer of Between The Lines, which can be
heard on more than 35 radio stations and in RealAudio and MP3 on our
website at http://www.btlonline.org. This interview excerpt was featured
on the award-winning, syndicated weekly radio newsmagazine, Between The
Lines for the week ending May 6, 2005. This Between The Lines Q&A was
compiled by Scott Harris and Anna Manzo.

========================

TO DONATE

It's your future ... help make a difference against the corporate
media's blackout of news and viewpoints like those in the interview
above by helping us distribute to a wider audience in 2005! Please send
your donation to:

Squeaky Wheel Productions, Inc.
P.O. Box 110176
Trumbull, CT 06611

*** Please note: If you would like your donation to be tax-deductible,
please make your check out to our fiscal sponsor, The Center for Global
Communications Foundation Inc. (or The Global Center) and send to the
above address.***

====================================

PRINT INFORMATION: For reprint permission, please email
betweenthelines at snet.net.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.indymedia.org/pipermail/imc-dc/attachments/20050512/e21391f8/attachment.htm 
-------------- next part --------------
To post to the entire BTLCREW list, make sure your TO: field is addressed to btlcrew at lists.riseup.net
If you want to reply to the original sender of a message, make sure your TO: field has the sender's email address. (Otherwise, private messages will go to the whole list!)

To view the archives of this list, see: http://lists.riseup.net/www/arc/btlcrew
To unsubscribe from this list, send an email to: btlcrew-unsubscribe at lists.riseup.net.



-------------- next part --------------
If you are interested in Between The Lines Summary, a summary of the week's interviews with RealAudio link, email btlsummary-subscribe at lists.riseup.net.

To subscribe to Between The Lines Q&A, email btlqa-subscribe at lists.riseup.net.
To unsubscribe, email btlqa-unsubscribe at lists.riseup.net