[imc-documentation] Fw: See Letter: Fw: In an article in The New York Times date October 17, 2004, Sunday's Style

[Jason E. Pacifico]

----- Original Message ----- 
From: Jason E. Pacifico 
To: pfaw at pfaw.com 
Sent: Wednesday, October 20, 2004 3:26 PM
Subject: In an article in The New York Times date October 17, 2004, Sunday's Style


Jason E. Pacifico
99 Ravenhurst Avenue
Staten Island, NY 10310
718-447-2241


October 20, 2004


People for the American Way
2000 M Street NW, Suite 400
Washington, DC 20036
                                      
                 Re: Courting Disaster in 2004
                                         

       In an article in The New York Times date October 17, 2004, Sunday's Style, "The Unsettling Stories of Two Lonely Dolls," is a story about a young artist rediscovering a favorite  book from her childhood, "The Lonely Doll," (published in 1957 by Dare Wright), where she becomes eerily unsettled, and  has second thoughts of reading the book to her daughter, because of the apparent domination themes in the book. There is a  disturbing scene in the book where the lonely doll get spanked provocatively (pedophilily?) by the bear. I have to say, I heard that books like this often are styled, as their real life-dolls, as a prelude to forms of molestation. It is my argument that molestation (it root is economic) is a dominate (or beginning) forms of mutilation. Certainly, the photo in the New York Times of a scene of a real-life Lonely Doll being spanked on the rear, propped in a way where the doll's genitalia is exposed makes the case. I have heard stories of young girls being asked to perform pretended sexual acts on real-life Lonely Doll by cults pretending to be educational or scientific   organizations for kids and adults, for the reason or pretext to molest the child at a later date. It occurred to me this problem is really as old as the Republic.

        During the Declaratory Act of 1766 in Colonial America, the British declared such a right to exact against the colonist and their children. After the Republic was founded, there were many proposals in regard to a shared realization, economic path and freedom--I don't think one is without the other, and many would argue these were the  reasons that led to the Declaratory Act of 1766, for some sort of social and economic realization for the country (people) as well. There were many proposals, however, one of the interesting developments, and how ultimately legislation, as well as social, psychological and epistemological construct and models, on nearly every topic, that were later formed or drafted from or lack thereof, was how the currency was issued and what to name it. This might have something to do with how economic ownership models and behavior were formed and inculcated affectuating psychological development in the Republic. I think the British built many historical models of dysfunction in order to chattelize people, and keep them economically repressed. There are theories on how  prison systems throughout civilization and cultures formed historically this way.

        The currency, after many proposals, was named epistemologically after 'doll,' this was a British proposals, and the country as a result has been making little bits of progress and retrogressing since. Millions of people perished in the country historically, because there were a lack of job rights or living wages, or labor rights or censorship on or inequitably applied currency multiplication policies on business, job and wage formation, in the country because their rights were not preserve or fully established historically and retrospectively. It seems from a sociological and economic perspective this is model of molestation and mutilation. And we are still retrogressing because we have lost nearly a century of progress in basic and fundamental rights.

        I have made a proposal to link job formation to ESHLA or employee shareholding and to link the formation of the currency to business formation and job and wage realization. I have proposed a 1.58 Fedwire plan and or 2x multiplication to be applied to living wages. It also make the point if we rename and replace the "dollar" and issue a new currency "Achroma" with this realization-- that we are all connected to this experience and have a shared realization in the country, in  business formation, product development, job formation, etc., we could change or realized a more fairer and  profound spiritual path without the retrogression! There would be, of course, less of a dysfunctional society, which seems to be the reasons why they are pushing the domination (sexual and economic side) themes in the country. The new "Achroma" or currency for the country would also say rather than in "God We TRUST" (economic it turned out historically with the formation of trust), in ESHLA we are, is knowledge is love is empathy is a shared realization is happiness. 

                              
                                  Jason E. Pacifico


     
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.indymedia.org/pipermail/imc-documentation/attachments/20041023/00a93c73/attachment.html