[Imc-india] CONSENSUS v2.0 IMC India suspends open publishing until new-imc process done

[boud]

sorry, i forgot to include the link to the proposal. you'll see it 
below, just above the text of the proposal.


On Tue, 21 Mar 2006, boud wrote:

> hi imc-india
>
> It seems to me that since noone objected before 12 January (or later), that 
> there is consensus on the version 2.0 of the proposal.
>
> tech side: aravind said he'll contact pietro and rhatto, so IMHO you
> should feel free to do the following with consensus from the "temporary"
> collective, since now the political decision is made, techies can do this
> without feeling they are making a political decision.
>
>  # (1) temporarily suspend open publishing on the existing web site
>
>  # (2) put a notice on the existing web site announcing the need to
>  # reorganise a new collective
>
>  # (3) in the notice, express the hope to try to organise a
>  # new collective (possibly a city  based collective rather than
>  # a "national" one) which will go through the new-imc organising process
>  # (http://docs.indymedia.org/view/Global/NewImcHowTo)
>
> Maybe you should also put a link to
> http://docs.indymedia.org/view/Local/ImcIndiaWho
> since there are seven people inside India with one or two people in
> each of several big cities and there is more chance of contact if people
> know who is who.
>
> * There's also someone with a request for hiding personal info:
> http://lists.indymedia.org/pipermail/imc-india/2006-March/0321-a5.html
>
>
> solidarity
> boud
>

The text below is from:
http://lists.indymedia.org/pipermail/imc-india/2005-December/1230-2r.html

>
>  ######################################################################
>  # PROPOSAL: IMC India suspends open publishing until new-imc process done
>  # Version 2.0
>  #
>  # DEADLINE: Thursday 12 January 2006
>  #
>  # (If noone has opposed this proposal by the deadline, then there is 
> internal
>  # IMC India consensus.)
>  #
>  # Noting that
>  # (a) IMC India has been through several ups and downs of
>  # temporary collectives over the past few years and has functioned more
>  # as an electronic collaboration rather than as a real local collective:
>  # http://docs.indymedia.org/view/Local/ImcIndia
>  # (b) during the periods of inactivity, there can be quite a few spam and 
> hate
>  # posts
>  # (c) the people with editorial access are slow to respond to attempts at
>  # contact on the imc-india mailing list,  (the most recent active
>  # editor, vickram crishna, e.g. see
>  # http://lists.indymedia.org/pipermail/imc-india/2005-February/0216-8d.html 
> -
>  # now has his emails bouncing from mailman "(vvcrishna at softhome.net)"
>  # (d) there are about 150 non-bouncing subscribers to imc-india - among 
> those
>  # living in India, it should be possible to organise a *real* collective,
>  #
>  # the present volunteers of IMC India and supporter (i.e. people on the
>  # imc-india mailing list) decide to:
>  #
>  # (1) temporarily suspend open publishing on the existing web site
>  # (2) put a notice on the existing web site announcing the need to
>  # reorganise a new collective
>  # (3) in the notice, express their hope to try to organise a
>  # new collective (possibly a city  based collective rather than
>  # a "national" one) which will go through the new-imc organising process
>  # (http://docs.indymedia.org/view/Global/NewImcHowTo)
>  ######################################################################
>
>
>
>