[Imc-london] Professor Tariq Ramadan, prohibited from entering the United States

Tue Aug 24 16:59:51 PDT 2004

Professor Tariq Ramadan, prohibited from entering the United States

On the 2nd August, 2004, the American Embassy in Berne (Switzerland) informed Professor Tariq Ramadan by telephone that the US Homeland Security Department had decided to revoke the visa of residence and work (H1) originally granted to him on 5th May 2004. The Consul General failed to explain the reasons for this decision (which remain unknown at the time of writing) and indicated that he could go through a fresh process to obtain a new visa if he so desired.

This decision occurred exactly 9 days before his intended departure, with his entire family, from Switzerland to the United States on the 11th August, where he was to begin teaching on the 23rd of the same month at the University of Notre Dame (Indiana). His children were already registered in their respective US schools, and their furniture and belongings had also arrived in the United States. 

He himself contacted the University of Notre Dame on the 2nd August who knew nothing of the decision to revoke his visa: the US Homeland Security Department had not contacted them. The University immediately demanded that the decision be justified and reconsidered by the highest bodies within the American administration. This process is still continuing. In addition the Swiss Minister of Foreign Affairs, Micheline Calmy-Rey, has personally requested that the American authorities provide an explanation for the way Professor Ramadan has been treated in this matter warning that such a treatment could damage academic relations between the two countries. 

Background 

In June 2003, Tariq Ramadan accepted an offer from the University of Notre Dame (Indiana) and the Kroc International Institute of Peace to become Professor of Islamic Studies and "Luce Professor" in charge of the program "Religion, Conflict and Peacebuilding".

In February 2004, the University of Notre Dame submitted an application to employ him, which was accepted by the US Justice Department and, notably, the Homeland Security Department. The application for a visa was made at the US Embassy in Berne (Switzerland) on the 24th March 2004. The processing of his case, which mainly focused on security implications, proceeded normally and clearance was finally granted in Washington on the 7th April. He received a visa of residence and work (H1) on the 5th May, and they immediately began preparations to move and set up a new home in South Bend, three months before the inexplicable decision communicated to him on the 2nd August.

The entire administrative process to obtain clearance to teach, and the requisite visa to travel and work in the United States, took place between February and May 2004, well after the controversy surrounding him in France. In other words, the US administration's original decision to grant him a visa was taken in full knowledge of the facts, and presumably with meticulous consideration of his  profile and case on both intellectual and security grounds. 

Therefore, the only possible rationale for this decision by the US administration is that it was taken in the context of the summer terror alerts' in New York and Washington. It is well known that the Department of Homeland Security's use of IT and "lists of suspects" is often erroneous, recently demonstrated in relation to Senator Edward Kennedy himself. And it is of course widely accepted by the international community that many of the decisions on such issues are taken arbitrarily without due consideration for the rights of the individual.  Just as pertinent however is the recognition that a few individuals and organizations had openly deplored and opposed the decision of Notre Dame to offer Professor Ramadan an academic posting. The silence of the US administration regarding its motivations leads to believe that it may be political pressure that is the real reason behind this last minute decision to ban Professor Ramadan from the United States. There would appear no alternative but to conclude, as the attached article from today's Chicago Tribune points out, that it is his analyses and perspectives as a distinguished scholar challenging the dominant discourse in the USA regarding the Islamic world that are, in reality being silenced by this decision.

The University of Notre Dame however has refused to accept this decision and has requested an explanation from senior figures within the American administration. Various legal and political procedures are also currently being pursued so as to ensure that Prof. Ramadan is able to fulfill his academic obligations to provide tuition on "Islamic ethics" as timetabled for the fall semester 2004-2005.

This arbitrary decision is not only a breach of human rights and academic freedom of expression. By this action, the US administration has not only targeted the wrong individual in the name of its 'war against terrorism'. But more damaging it is silencing the voice of a scholar who has a long and proud record of denouncing extremism, narrow literalism and anti-Semitism within Muslim communities and societies.  

If the current situation remains unchanged this decision will prevent Professor Ramadan from not only fulfilling his academic duties but also from participating in a number of high profile conferences that he is scheduled to attend. These include: the University of Stanford on 12 - 14th September, by invitation of the France-Stanford Center for Interdisciplinary Studies ; a visit to New York on 27th September by invitation of former President Bill Clinton ; and an engagement in Florida on 19-21st November at the invitation of William S. Cohen, the former US Secretary of Defense.

Professor Ramadan remains hopeful however that the American administration will rescind this arbitrary decision and allow him not only to continue his work at the University of Notre Dame, but also his active engagement and contribution to the vital inter-faith and dialogue of civilizations which has characterized his contribution to creating a peaceful and pluralistic society for us all to live in. 

Tariq Ramadan' office (Europe)

--------------------
Muslim scholar has visa revoked 

--------------------

By Geneive Abdo, Tribune religion reporter. Cam Simpson in the Tribune's Washington bureau contributed to this report

August 24, 2004

The U.S. Department of Homeland Security has revoked a visa granted to Tariq Ramadan, a renowned Islamic scholar who is accused by some Jewish groups of being a Muslim extremist, effectively barring him from a teaching post he was to begin this week at the University of Notre Dame.

Ramadan, a rising academic star in Europe who is regarded by Islamic scholars and experts as a Muslim moderate, was appointed to teach Islamic philosophy and ethics in South Bend through the Joan B. Kroc Institute for International Peace Studies. University classes begin Tuesday.

A resident of Switzerland, Ramadan was given a visa in February that permitted him to work in the United States, according to government officials. That decision was reversed July 28.

Notre Dame officials said the university was working with the U.S. government and hoped to have the decision reversed. In a statement issued to the Tribune, the university said no reason was given for the visa revocation.

"Professor Ramadan is a distinguished scholar and a voice for moderation in the Muslim world," the university said. "We know of no reason his entry should be prevented."

Kelly Shannon, a spokeswoman for the State Department's consular affairs section, said Monday that Ramadan initially received a visa after being cleared by Homeland Security. But Homeland Security later reversed its decision, ordering the State Department to revoke the visa.

According to Shannon, Ramadan's visa was revoked under a section of the U.S. immigration law dramatically changed by the USA Patriot Act, the controversial legislation approved after the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks.

In addition to allowing the U.S. to revoke a visa from an alleged member of a terrorist organization, the new section authorizes visa revocation because of someone's political activities if those efforts are seen as endorsing terrorism. Visas also can be revoked because of membership in social groups or other organizations that have offered a "public endorsement of acts of terrorist activity" that could undermine U.S. "efforts to reduce or eliminate terrorist activities."

Shannon did not say which specific piece of the law was applied in Ramadan's case.

Contacted by phone, Ramadan declined to comment Monday.

It is Ramadan's pedigree, rather than his writings, that has particularly exposed him to criticism. His grandfather is Hassan al-Banna, who in 1928 founded the Muslim Brotherhood, a conservative religious and political organization that has influenced Islamic groups and movements across the world. Founded as a radical group that sought the violent overthrow of the secular Egyptian government, it has since renounced violence as a means for political change.

Notre Dame officials felt Ramadan's perspective would be valuable to the conversation in the U.S. about Islam. Departing from traditional Islamic thinking, Ramadan has written that there are multiple interpretations of the Koran and that Muslims should engage in ijtihad, a perpetual process of interpreting the holy texts of Islam so that the faith evolves and is compatible with modern times.

Barring intellectuals such as Ramadan from the United States undermines the U.S. government's efforts to fight terrorism, said John Esposito, a Georgetown University professor and author of "Unholy War: Terror in the Name of Islam."

"At the heart of it, people refuse to distinguish moderate Muslims from extremists," said Esposito, who describes Ramadan as "an established academic . . . with a strong record."

"They want to say all Muslims are a monolithic threat, which means they are excluding the very audience President Bush and his administration should be reaching out to--the moderates," said Esposito, a leading expert on Islam.

He and other scholars said they suspected the government's decision to bar Ramadan could have been influenced by some Jewish groups that have waged a campaign against scholars and public intellectuals whose views on Islam and the Middle East conflict with their own.

For example, Web sites such as Campus Watch, run by pro-Israel activist Daniel Pipes, seek to expose professors who allegedly hold anti-Israel views.

"The essence of the problem is that pro-Likud organizations want to block people who can speak articulately and present the Muslim dilemma in a way that might be understandable and sympathetic to Americans," said Graham Fuller, former vice chairman of the National Intelligence Council at the Central Intelligence Agency. The Likud party leads the political coalition currently in power in Israel.

"They succeed by presenting this as a security matter. There is no way Homeland Security would initiate this on its own," said Fuller, who is an expert on political Islam.

Some Jewish groups in France have called Ramadan an anti-Semite, and pro-Israel activists in the United States have contended he is connected to Al Qaeda. However, investigations in other countries have never substantiated links between Ramadan and Al Qaeda.

Pipes said Monday that he did not know of any Jewish groups in the United States that had filed a complaint about Ramadan with the federal government. But it's possible some might have done so, he added.

"I do know that elements in France have told the U.S. government that he is not suitable for the position," said Pipes, director of the Philadelphia-based Middle East Forum, a strongly pro-Israel advocacy group.

"I worry that he is engaged in a complex game of appearing as a moderate but has connections to Al Qaeda," said Pipes, who said he read about those connections in the French media.

Scott Appleby, director of Notre Dame's Kroc Institute, challenged Ramadan's critics to provide evidence of such links.

"If Mr. Pipes or anyone else has solid evidence that Tariq Ramadan has `connections' with Al Qaeda--whatever that might mean--I would like to see it," Appleby said. "Otherwise, unsubstantiated charges intended to defame a Muslim intellectual is troublingly reminiscent of some of the darkest moments in U.S history."

Rashid Khalidi, a Middle East expert at Columbia University who has been harshly criticized by Jewish groups for speaking out against the Israeli occupation of Palestinian territories, said his critics try to block scholars who disagree with their views.

"These people simply don't want these voices to be heard. Anyone who complicates this by introducing real views of real people that Americans might find reasonable seems threatening to them," said Khalidi, who along with Esposito has been targeted on the Campus Watch site.

Ramadan's case, he said, demonstrates how scholars' views can be distorted by their opponents.

Asked if his aim was to remove Islamic and Middle Eastern professors from their teaching posts, Pipes said, "Absolutely not."

"The purpose of Campus Watch is to alert administrators that there is a problem" with the views of some scholars, he said. "We have not taken any steps to have anyone removed from their jobs."

Copyright (c) 2004, Chicago Tribune

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.indymedia.org/pipermail/imc-london/attachments/20040825/0d396ed3/attachment.htm 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: Tariq Ramadan Office.doc
Type: application/msword
Size: 34816 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.indymedia.org/pipermail/imc-london/attachments/20040825/0d396ed3/attachment.doc 