[imc-oxford-features] Tatchell post hiding (383490)

[Mr. Demeanour]

owen at riseup.net wrote:
> The guidelines definitely provide grounds for hiding it:
> 
> 'Inaccurate : posts that are inaccurate or misleading.' 
> http://www.indymedia.org.uk/en/static/editorial.html

I'm actually against hiding that article (and its comments), unless
Tatchell has asked for it to be hidden.
> 
> Having said that, there is often a debate to be had about whether it
> is sometimes better to leave a thread where it is if commenters have
> already set things straight. Personally, in this case I don't have
> strong feelings either way.

Nor me - that is, I'm not going to unhide it if it's hidden. I think the
comments are an adequate response to the slurs; and I think that the
"any publicity is good publicity" argument might be applicable in this
case (I shall be voting for him, I expect, whenever Gord deigns to give
me the opportunity).
> 
> Owen the crackling ancient speaker

Oh, perhaps your middle name is "Ming" :-)

-- 
Jack.