[imc-oxford-features] [IMC-Process] Proposal: IMC Oxford
mrdemeanour at jackpot.uk.net
Sat Oct 15 11:58:51 PDT 2011
On 15/10/2011 18:28, Adelayde Skidmore wrote:
> Personally, I think it's quite fair enough for you to respond as it is
> obvious that you are the person referred to.
There's nothinbg to respond to; it seems that bart's email got blocked
in moderation. Which I don't understand, because he moderates that
list. Whatever, Bart's email never landed anywhere except here, as a cc
of a non-existent master message.
So neither I nor we actually have anything to reply to.
> However, I feel that we as a collective need to respond, and also that
> we need to be able to stand by you as part of our collective.
Well, we can reply to our own list if we want to. But I suspect that
Bart has been sat upon, and that it isn't any longer an issue. My guess
is that if there isn't an issue, we don't need to kick up any shit about
> I hope
> therefore that G's response goes to the list, and I also feel that if we
> maintain our united and neutral stance and continue to focus on doing
> good Indymedia work and strengthening and reinvigorating our collective,
> as is our wish, then we will be successful.
As far as I'm concerned, we are successful: today's the deadline, and
there have been no (coherent) objections. I'm just waiting for JD to
declare our glorious success.
More information about the imc-oxford-features