[IMC-pgh-discuss] the situation with SF-IMC?

[David Meieran]

since becoming friends with some of the portland and indybay imcistas i 
trust their perspectives on the problem. i support both SF IndyBays' 
attempt to resolve the situation and portland's decision to censure 
SF-IMC.

whether that means indypgh should adopt the same stance as portlands' 
is another matter, however. let's discuss it at tomorrow's mtg.

dm



On Friday, January 16, 2004, at 11:09  AM, A R wrote:

> Just curious if there's been any discussion in Pgh-IMC about 
> addressing the SF-IMC-SF indybay situation?
> For those who don't know what's going on- one side of the story is at 
> http://portland.indymedia.org/en/2004/01/277978.shtml
>
> I've been following it a little and have to agree with Portland IMC's 
> response to the situation.
> http://portland.indymedia.org/en/2004/01/278491.shtml
>
> I think we should address it- and since our cities link points 
> exclusively to the SF-IMC as of now it seems like we are taking a 
> position.
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> Find high-speed ‘net deals — comparison-shop your local providers 
> here. https://broadband.msn.com
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> IMC-pgh-discuss mailing list
> IMC-pgh-discuss at lists.indypgh.org
> http://lists.indypgh.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/imc-pgh-discuss