[IMC-pgh-editorial] ACORN ad

[mtoups at andrew.cmu.edu]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Tue, 14 Oct 2003, John Harrold wrote:

> | So I guess in general I'd want to know if we can come to some consensus
> | (unless this is already covered somewhere) about whether our moving a post
> | to the appropriate location and displaying it suggests that we believe it
> | is legit and, if that's not the case, if we should have a disclaimer
> | somewhere.
>
> i don't think we give legitimacy to anything we don't make a feature. we
> might give legitimacy to something if we link to it as a feature. we do
> have a disclaimer that is attached to the bottom of every page:
>
> http://www.indypgh.org/process/disclaimer.php
>
> i only brought it up again because i wanted to give the person who sent the
> request an answer. so should i tell acorn person she can publish it, and we
> would appreciate an explict message saying we are not affiliated with the
> message?

yes, i like this solution.  the question of acorn's
legitimacy, labor practices, accomplishments, etc
would be best asked publicly on our site, rather than
merely between editors.

let the open publishing begin!

i'm glad that john's taking the time go give her the
best answer, though.  rock on john.

- -matt
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org

iEYEARECAAYFAj+Mx68ACgkQ+eACUM6c6K0VIwCg0+HKbSTdHkUsNaZMP8w53Y80
recAn0P2PDVB1pVp5WDfOGsiTawgQu1U
=VJoQ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----