[Fwd: [IMC-Process] Re: [New-imc] imc kenya process

[Deja]

blicero wrote:

>On Sun, Feb 27, 2005 at 11:49:08PM -0800, Deja wrote:
>  
>
>>I second this concern.
>>
>>Process was not properly followed on this application.
>>
>>Deja
>>
>>
>>ana wrote:
>>
>>    
>>
>>>Hi,
>>>
>>>im re-sending this here because i think i have seen some kind of 
>>>welcome?? is there any reason why this observation about their lack of 
>>>any form of contact details to get involved with the current 
>>>collective has been ignored?
>>>
>>>      
>>>
>
>i did not understand the concern
>if it's the lack of a ml or of a contact mail on the site, one could also think
>that media and self-organizatoin ion kenya works a bit differently than in other
>places like uk or even uruguay.
>
>in general they followed up the form with the news of having opened a new ml
>so i guess this is obvercome in facts if not in proper process.
>
>I feel they are working along imc principles even if not strictly along imc
>bureaucracy :))))
>
>ciao
>blicero
>
>
>  
>
Just to be clear, I myself am not questioning thier application, just 
that there is a consunsus process that should be followed. The proposal 
was put forward that Kenya be allowed into the network, Ana raised a 
concern, the concern was not responded to and the sponsor said that 
there had been no questions. What should of happened is that the concern 
should be publically addressed and then the application moves forward.

So, the Kenya group is indeed working along IMC principals, but thier 
sponsor did not maintain transparency in the process. Something that is 
quite important for happy network vibes :)

Deja