[imc-queer] Editorial Policy
pina at riseup.net
pina at riseup.net
Mon Feb 28 18:09:59 PST 2005
Hi Vince
i'm sorry i dont understand exctally what process list were you ralking
about? imc-communication? if yes, this is not a process list, it's a list
for communication between imc's, for process we have imc-process, a
decision making list, which tries to solve problems inside the network...
you can find all list of indymedias in http://lists.indymedia.org/
=)
Pina
> <html><div style='background-color:'><P><BR><BR></P>
> <DIV>
> <DIV class=RTE>
> <P>Pina,</P>
> <P>Thanks so much for your. It does take courage to speak up!
> I actually was unaware of that particular process list, and will
> search for it, or if it is available to you, would you be able to
> send me the link?</P>
> <P>Also, I will try to find some positive information I wrote regarding a
> humanistic moderation policy. When I switched computers, I lost some
> information, so I don't have it readily accessible.</P>
> <P>Finally, one thing that will probably come up, at some point on
> IMC Queer, as it has on some radical queer listserves I belong
> to, is the dissident perspective on AIDs. Thinking about this
> volatile issue before hand, as well as formulating an appropriate
> policy and responses through consensus will probably avoid future
> issues.</P>
> <P>In Solidarity,</P>
> <P>Vince<BR><BR></P></DIV>
> <DIV></DIV>>From: pina em riseup.net
> <DIV></DIV>>Reply-To: IMC Queer <imc-queer em lists.indymedia.org>
> <DIV></DIV>>To: "IMC Queer" <imc-queer em lists.indymedia.org>
> <DIV></DIV>>CC: imc-queer em lists.indymedia.org
> <DIV></DIV>>Subject: RE: [imc-queer] Editorial Policy
> <DIV></DIV>>Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2005 13:42:39 -0800 (PST)
> <DIV></DIV>>
> <DIV></DIV>>Hi Vince and all
> <DIV></DIV>>I did not know all those things about indymedia nyc... i
> sugested this ep,
> <DIV></DIV>>cause i like the way they are not only about things they
> dont wont on
> <DIV></DIV>>their web site... this ep also includes stuff they actually
> want and
> <DIV></DIV>>support. I´m not very aware of the internal conflicts of
> indymedia nyc,
> <DIV></DIV>>and i´m not saying that we should replicate that behavior.
> I´m saying that
> <DIV></DIV>>we need to come up with our own ep. I only sent this so ppl
> could actually
> <DIV></DIV>>start discuss this issue, otherwise we wont be able to
> build a real queer
> <DIV></DIV>>imc. Did you also noticed that i sent a link to a very
> interesting doc on
> <DIV></DIV>>our docs page??? We can start to discuss that page instead
> of nyc
> <DIV></DIV>>editorial police.
> <DIV></DIV>>Vince if you actually feel that way about indymedia nyc, i
> sugest you to
> <DIV></DIV>>bring this issue on imc-communication, there is a much more
> apropriated
> <DIV></DIV>>place to discuss this.
> <DIV></DIV>>Cheers
> <DIV></DIV>>=)
> <DIV></DIV>>Pina
> <DIV></DIV>>
> <DIV></DIV>>------------------------------------------------------
> <DIV></DIV>>
> <DIV></DIV>>
> <DIV></DIV>>
> <DIV></DIV>>
> <DIV></DIV>>
> <DIV></DIV>> > <html><div
> style='background-color:'><P>What a seemingly pretty, but
> <DIV></DIV>> > hollow document. NYC IMC, it's editors, have a
> notorious reputation for
> <DIV></DIV>> > abusing their moderation policy. Don't believe me? Go
> see to their hidden
> <DIV></DIV>> > section, and see for yourself. I'm not sure why we'd
> seek to replicate
> <DIV></DIV>> > such. </P>
> <DIV></DIV>> > <DIV>
> <DIV></DIV>> > <DIV>
> <DIV></DIV>> > <DIV class=RTE>
> <DIV></DIV>> > <P>Why give a queer imprimatur to a collective
> that that has a checkered
> <DIV></DIV>> > history, including on queer/trans/bi community
> concerns.&nbsp; There is
> <DIV></DIV>> > extensive documentation available which raises these
> concerns</P>
> <DIV></DIV>> > <P><A
> <DIV></DIV>> >
> href="http://archives.lists.indymedia.org/imc-germany/2004-January/002831.html">http://archives.lists.indymedia.org/imc-germany/2004-January/002831.html</A></P>
> <DIV></DIV>> > <P>There are lots of IMC editorial policies on
> which to base ours. Let's
> <DIV></DIV>> > get off to a fresh start.</P>
> <DIV></DIV>> > <P>As a moderator with NJ IMC, I understand the
> need for moderation, but
> <DIV></DIV>> > is it really necessary for editors with nyc imc to
> hide countless posts
> <DIV></DIV>> > daily, each accompanied by an ill-tempered comment
> that this person or
> <DIV></DIV>> > that person is a troll, or is horrid, or has two
> heads or whatever? Is
> <DIV></DIV>> > that mature? Is that professional? Is that the image
> that we want to
> <DIV></DIV>> > convey? Abusive behavior by someone vested with some
> authority, as the nyc
> <DIV></DIV>> > editors are, is NOT cutting edge, or cool, or
> something, or whatever! It
> <DIV></DIV>> > is cruel. There is no excuse that this bullying
> behavior is tolerated. To
> <DIV></DIV>> > acquiesce is to give tacit approval. </P>
> <DIV></DIV>> > <P>Vince</P>
> <DIV></DIV>>
> <DIV></DIV>>
> <DIV></DIV>>_______________________________________________
> <DIV></DIV>>imc-queer mailing list
> <DIV></DIV>>imc-queer em lists.indymedia.org
> <DIV></DIV>>http://lists.indymedia.org/mailman/listinfo/imc-queer
> <DIV></DIV></DIV></div><br clear=all><hr> <a
> href="http://g.msn.com/8HMAENUS/2752??PS=47575" target="_top">Find files
> on your PC instantly with the new MSN Toolbar Suite beta – FREE!</a>
> </html>
>
> _______________________________________________
> imc-queer mailing list
> imc-queer em lists.indymedia.org
> http://lists.indymedia.org/mailman/listinfo/imc-queer
>
More information about the imc-queer
mailing list