[imc-scotland-discussion] Re: feature proposals
sean.hammond at gmail.com
Sat Oct 1 08:58:31 PDT 2005
it seems our editorial policy is not as ad-hoc as I had thought.
I really like the G8 Reflections feature, so thanks for sorting it out.
On 10/1/05, Anarcho Babe <anarchobabe at fempages.org> wrote:
> before proposing articles for features please read the editorial
> 1.) the pictures needs to go to the right (layout decision)
> 2.) the abstract should give a summary of what why when where who happened
> and link to where to find more infos (excluding links to mainstream
> media), pictures and subjective reports
> 3.) ideally the features should group together postings relating to the
> same issue
> 4.) the features should be focussed on news reporting, opinion pieces
> should stay in the newswire.
> There should be no direct calls for actions in the features, as we are a
> news site and not particularly an activist campaigning site. If we call
> for particular actions in the features, we might loose the more or less
> journalistic status we occasionally hold, this is of importance
> particularly at demos and it might eventually endanger the
> reporters/editors/website to even more state and legal repression if we
> 5.) the features should be of higher quality than the newswire. This
> should regard content and research for content, layout and style.
> cheerio Ulla
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the imc-scotland-discussion