[imc-scotland-discussion] Some wee changes to the site

Ulla ulla at j12.org
Wed Nov 28 08:34:02 PST 2007


we have got about 80 links in our link directory. I don't know why it was 
taken off, I think must have been some technical error.
All of them don't fit into the Notice box, it was a seperate module.

bye for now
Ulla


On Wednesday 28 Nov 2007 15:57, Mike wrote:
> Who chooses what's 'radical'. I think we shoud be inclusive and link to
> everything unless its (obviously) unacceptable.
>
> Or put it another way and link to al progressive campaigns.
>
> Mike<html><div><FONT size=1><STRONG>INDYMEDIA SCOTLAND
> </STRONG><BR>http://scotland.indymedia.org</FONT></div></html>> Date: Wed,
> 28 Nov 2007 12:49:29 +0000> From: tom at infoseed.co.uk> To:
> imc-scotland-discussion at lists.indymedia.org> Subject: Re:
> [imc-scotland-discussion] Some wee changes to the site> > -----BEGIN PGP
> SIGNED MESSAGE-----> Hash: SHA1> > Mike wrote:> > I agree with all aboutthe
> Notices being very in your face. > > There is a links module where they can
> appear down the left/righthand> side, but when enabled it complains about a
> missing file. We can> probably fix this when we get server access again. It
> would be better> than using the big red razorwire thing.> > > Surely we
> should be linking to campaigns like Edinburgh Chiapas though, isnt that
> what we're all about?> > Yeah. do we have a policy about which campaigns
> get links? What i think> we should do is:> > either:> > get rid of all
> links to campaigns and have only links to 'radical'> places, like ACE
> and... and ACE and other places> > or:> > link to pretty much every
> campaign going on. we could quickly decide> which at meetings, and
> regularly revise this list> >




More information about the imc-scotland-discussion mailing list