[imc-scotland-discussion] Potential RSS feeds
Ben
bencrosbie at gmail.com
Thu Mar 5 04:18:06 PST 2009
Just read second email form chris now... doh...
On Thu, Mar 5, 2009 at 12:16 PM, Ben <bencrosbie at gmail.com> wrote:
> Here's the feed for that here
>
> http://www.libcom.org/taxonomy/term/1115/all/feed
>
> On Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 8:14 PM, chris <chris-h at diskant.net> wrote:
>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> Hmm. Bad to reply to myself but as far as LibCom feeds are concerned,
>> there's also:
>> http://www.libcom.org/tags/scotland (webpage)
>> http://www.libcom.org/taxonomy/term/1115/all/feed (feed)
>>
>> Which includes both the news and the library articles. There aren't many
>> library articles and the ones that there are, are very good (IMO).
>>
>> So I propose we add this feed in preference to the non-existent
>> news-tag-scotland one.
>>
>> c
>>
>> chris wrote:
>>> Been looking for more news feeds for us to eat, have hit a bone:
>>>
>>> LibCom news tagged with "scotland" is on this page and I think worth including:
>>> http://www.libcom.org/news/scotland
>>> ...it looks like there should be a feed of only these articles at:
>>> http://www.libcom.org/news/feed/scotland
>>> ...but this includes *all* their news, not just the stuff we want.
>>>
>>> ---> does anyone have an account there and could they ask about getting the
>>> likelihood of them fixing the feed?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> And something for people to chew the cud over:
>>>
>>> I agree we shouldn't (yet?) host individual bloggers' feeds, but what do we
>>> think of campaign groups' sites, either political or single-issue? They are
>>> not strictly news sites, but they have news on them.
>>>
>>> I have loads of these on my feed reader, e.g.:
>>> Common Good Watch (land issues)
>>> * http://commongoodwatch.wordpress.com
>>> Independent Republic of the Canongate (Edinburgh developments)
>>> * http://independentrepublicofthecanongate.blogspot.com/
>>>
>>> The first of those is single issue but the whole of Scotland, the 2nd is
>>> single issue (arguably a much narrower one) and Edinburgh-specific. I think
>>> they both do a good job and I have cut n paste their work to the site before.
>>>
>>> Are these the kind of thing we want? Are there guidelines / rules of thumb
>>> we can think of using?
>>>
>>
>> - --
>> chris h
>>
>>
>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
>> Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
>> Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
>>
>> iD8DBQFJruEurk7gpnTYWdwRAhTsAJ9xpobfCiDtIBXWS8Bq0dLaexfVggCgnVXY
>> u4ypal8U91wLZC2pn1yJRhY=
>> =KlB1
>> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>> _______________________________________________
>> imc-scotland-discussion mailing list
>> List-Unsubscribe: imc-scotland-discussion-request at lists.indymedia.org?subject=unsubscribe
>> http://lists.indymedia.org/mailman/listinfo/imc-scotland-discussion
>> http://scotland.indymedia.org
>> http://www.imcscotland.org
>>
>>
>
More information about the imc-scotland-discussion
mailing list