[imc-sheffield] [imc-uk-tech] IMC Sheffield Proposal
aland at aktivix.org
Wed Jan 19 01:15:21 PST 2011
On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 01:18:43AM +0000, JimDog wrote:
> With all due respect and though I understand the reasons for the proposal, I feel this would need to be agreed by all the collectives since it directly contravenes what was agreed in Bradford.
In the interests of making the Sheffield IMC position more clear, I'll reiterate.
Sheffield IMC fully supports the agreements made at the last network meeting, and will still work towards the resolutions made there.
Sheffield IMC would like as an interim measure to add develop some further features on Mir.
This is because
* the large mobilisation in Sheffield 11-13 March
* current levels of activism/grassroots activity in Sheffield
* Whatever else I wrote in the previous email.
> Enough time would be needed to discuss the proposal in the various collectives before responding.
Yes, please discuss this within your collectives.
> There is a valid counter argument for example that UK activism is better served by focusing on local organising and building a grassroots presence in our
+communities whilst people are engaged.
Sheffield IMC agrees completely with this statement.
Sheffield IMC is organising locally
Sheffield IMC has chosen the Mir UK platform
Sheffield IMC wishes to make some developments on the mir platform to better facilitate its community at this time.
> Perhaps this is an exciting opportunity for us to find new and innovative ways of working together?
GPG key: http://aland.burngreave.net/files/e81a4bba.gpg.pub.asc
Key Transition: http://aland.burngreave.net/files/keytransition.txt.asc
Further Reading: https://we.riseup.net/alster/openpgp-dsa1-key-rollover
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
Url : http://lists.indymedia.org/pipermail/imc-sheffield/attachments/20110119/3241aa34/attachment.pgp
More information about the imc-sheffield