[imc-st.louis] draft program on the environment
Don Fitz
fitzdon at aol.com
Mon Dec 15 07:04:51 PST 2008
At the Greens meeting Wed December 17, 08, 3026 Cherokee [at Minnesota],
we will be finalizing the draft program on the environment [below].
Please join us for the discussion and post any suggested additions or
deletions to GreensStL at yahoogroups.com before the meeting.
Don Fitz
*Green Party of St. Louis*
*Draft Platform on the Environment*
Recommended by the December 9, 2008 Elston K. McCowan for Mayor
Education & Environmental Committee Meeting
[This is a draft and *not* the final platform, which will appear on the
web. Paragraphs are numbered to help discussion of modifications of this
version — numbers will be removed in the final version.]
1. St. Louis should have an ecological approach to living that seriously
grapples with issues that confront us. Instead, the Slay administration
has a record of “greenwashing,” or using language that sounds
environmental while maintaining policies that are environmental disasters.
Slay’s Greenwashing
2. Though the voters of St. Louis said that they did not want to spend
public money on a private sports stadium, Slay advocated tearing down a
perfectly good stadium to replace it with one with fewer seats, and, in
the process, spewed a ton of CO2 into the atmosphere for every ton of
cement used.
3. When the West Nile virus scare hit, Slay’s Health Department ignored
information from environmentalists that pesticide sprays could not
reduce mosquito populations and worsened the City’s asthma problems as
it sprayed pesticides across St. Louis.
4. When lead contamination was found in 27 St. Louis schools, the Slay
administration was unable to help find the funds necessary to remove it;
but, at the same time, the scandal broke that he was spending $2 million
to “beautify” the Grand Avenue bridge. The excessive lights from the
Kingshighway and Grand Avenue bridges involves the burning of coal to
produce wasteful electricity.
5. Though City parks should be green spaces to unify neighborhoods [or:
Though neighborhood parks should be green spaces to unify communities…]
and larger parks unify the entire City, Francis Slay began the process
of privatizing parks by attempting to sell off a portion of Forest Park.
The Green Alternative
6. In contrast, the Green Party of St. Louis has a record of active
environmentalism.
· Greens have halted the construction of toxic incinerators and even
shut down medical waste incinerators.
· Greens have proposed alternatives to the spraying of pesticide poisons
to control mosquitoes.
· Greens gathered signatures for an audit of the City when it refused to
release information on where childhood lead poisoning prevention funds
were being spent and helped gather signatures to protect Forest Park.
· Greens have warned St. Louisans of potential dangers of eating
genetically engineered food.
7. The next mayor should make sure that incineration is not used as a
waste disposal method, never spray pesticides for insect control,
propose the labeling of food with genetically engineered components and
increase and maintain public parks throughout St. Louis (and not only in
south City).
A New Vision
8. The Green Party calls for a visionary long range program to
dramatically reduce pollution and greenhouse gases from transportation
and industry in the City of St. Louis within the next five years.
9. The most important source of “alternative energy” is using less
energy. The Greens would install solar panels on all public buildings to
generate energy and require utility companies to purchase excess power
produced by solar and wind generators on businesses and homes. In order
to obtain an occupancy permit a home should be required to meet at least
IECC-2009 standards of energy efficiency. This would include
reflectivity standards for roofing, which would vastly cut down air
conditioning, reduce cooling costs and result in less coal burning at
electric plants.
10. Greens advocate making all homes as weather-proof as possible, with
a focus on low income neighborhoods. For example, the Urban League will
not help weatherize homes if the heat has been cut off. This forces low
income people with their heat turned off to use space heaters which are
dangerous, costly, inefficient and produce excessive green house gases.
Weatherizing all homes will help low income residents financially and
reduce the amount of energy used, thereby lowering greenhouse gases.
11. The Greens would begin a massive educational program to help people
understand the need to use heat efficiently by wearing extra clothes and
turning the thermostat down when not at home. The Greens would initiate
a program to install free central heating systems in homes currently
without central heat for occupants who agree to an external governor
that sets the heat to no more than 68 degrees during the days and 55
degrees during sleeping hours.
12. The City should begin a demonstration program to construct at least
100 homes to /passivhaus/ standards by 2012, at least 30% of which must
be for low income families. A home with the German /passivhaus/ design
is so well insulated that it does not require a furnace. The approximate
10–15% extra cost in construction is far outweighed by the huge savings
in heating.
13. Policies of the Slay administration do not reflect an understanding
of the importance of trees in urban areas. Trees reduce contaminants
from the air. Trees help in stormwater management by slowing runoff.
Trees are important psychologically to encourage people to spend more
time outdoors and are important environmentally to help cool in summer
and break winter’s chilling winds. Mayor Slay’s program to improve
Martin Luther King Blvd. poured lots of new concrete but did not plant
trees. The Greens advocate tree planting next to road improvements, in
new developments and in treeless parks.
14. The Green Party advocates a jobs program to bury power lines
underground (as already done in much of Europe) both to prevent outages
during storms and to reduce the need to cut off tree branches. The jobs
program would also include opportunities for youth to work for both pay
and school credit by participating in urban gardening and city clean-up
and maintenance.
15. One reason that St. Louisans have so many respiratory problems is
that Missouri law prohibits air pollution rules stricter than federal
standards. Francis Slay has done nothing to protect citizens by opposing
this ridiculous restriction. Federal guidelines for air pollution were
designed to be minimum standards that local governments could strengthen
as they see fit. A Green mayor would actively lobby to overturn this
state law and would work with US representatives to draft federal
legislation to guarantee municipalities the right to strengthen
pollution standards.
16. While pretending to be environmentally friendly, Francis Slay has
not lobbied against plans to build an additional nuclear power plant in
central Missouri at Calloway. Nuclear power is arguably the worst
environmental disaster in human history — it risks a meltdown that could
destroy St. Louis and Kansas City; exposes workers to excess radiation
during routine operation; creates wastes that poison people for
thousands of generations, and drives up utility rates so high that low
income people cannot afford to pay them. A truly Green mayor would do
everything possible to prevent new nukes from opening, including
prohibiting nuclear power from being used in St. Louis.
More information about the Imc-stlouis
mailing list