[IMC-Tech] domain registrars, was: [Imc-tech-emerg] indymedia.org domain name issue summary

[Ringo]

Sorry for the second post but I didn't see enom in there. I have heard
horrible stories about enom, especially regarding censorship and
billing. I would absolutely not suggest them.

Ringo

ana wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> alongside maxigas's option, I would like the following options to be 
> looked at:
> 
> nearlyfreespeech.net
> RedBlackandGreen.net
> enom.com - seems to be based in Chicago (USA) and running Windows.
> 
> alto it would be good to ask the collectives listed here:
> http://help.riseup.net/resources/
> and the signatories of the manifesto here,
> http://aktivix.org
> what registrar they use and their experiences with them.
> 
> this might be the beginning of a "proper" research?
> 
> in any case, i'd prefer this list to stick to the purely technical aspects 
> of each options, i.e. what they require of us including moneys, and the 
> more political ones, i.e. whether the company that runs the service 
> operates like a collective or an NGO, whether it is necessary or not for 
> indymedia to not provide a real name to the registrar, for instance, to 
> lists like the communication list, for discussion, and then a concrete 
> proposal to be sent to process list.
> 
> ana
> london
> _______________________________________________
> imc-tech mailing list
> imc-tech at lists.indymedia.org
> http://lists.indymedia.org/mailman/listinfo/imc-tech
>