[Imc-uk-features] re: Why were these hidden?

[zcat at ametrika.com]

in that case why are all the comments that are just as disruptive but pro 
activism left?
and why do we have a add comments section that is plainly visable?
I happen to think guy knows what hes talking about hes been doing indy a 
long time now so...
ive unhidden that one, as if hidden we would have to hide the comments that 
rubbish concerned as they dont make sense without that comment and it makes 
the article so much stronger with the comments
Andrew 

ftp wrote:
>It was hidden as disruptive - Indymedia isn't a bulletin board
>best
>ftp

guy . wrote:
>> Hi
>>  there was comment attatched to this:
>> http://www.indymedia.org.uk/en/2006/01/332100.html
>> By a well known fuckwit called 'Concerned'. Although the comment was
>> in the style of a Daily Mail columnist it did NOT break the editorial
>> guidelines. So why has it been removed?
>>  
>> If moderators are abusing their position to give priority to their own
>> views then we are no longer a 'grassroots' service. Just another
>> politically controlled info source.
>>  
>> More to the point I made mincemeat of the comment made by 'Concerned'.
>>  Please put it back and my my reply. Thanks
>>  
>> Guy
 

 

http://zcat.blagblagblag.org
blag server http://blagblagblag.org/
wordpress blog http://wordpress.org/
G2 gallery http://codex.gallery2.org