[Imc-uk-features] Re: [imc-uk-legal] Post alleging that someone is a paedophile

GarconDuMonde gdm at fifthhorseman.net
Wed Jan 25 14:20:32 PST 2006

Hash: SHA1


Chris wrote:
> What evidence do you have that it is true?

err, you snipped quite a lot of my post ;-) i have *no* evidence that it is
true, i'll repeat what i said before:

chrisc wrote:
"I have just hidden this ... Not because of possible legal consequences (though
I guess there could be some?) but because this isn't what I think Indymedia is
for -- it's an article more suited to The Sun or Daily Mail..."

gdm wrote:
"well - i think that this is a *terrible* reason for hiding an article and i
think that it should be unhidden - at least until someone can come up with a
reason within the editorial guidelines."

> I not only object to it because I don't think it's what
> Indymedia is for but because I don't know if there is any
> truth in it...

you didn't say that before. but i'm still not sure which editorial guideline it
comes under...

> Also it looks like it was posted again and hidden again by
> someone else:
>   http://www.indymedia.org.uk/en/2006/01/332269.html?c=on

i'm gonna cc this to imc-features list then, as i still don't understand why it
has been hidden: afaik, we've not hidden "unverifiable" posts in the past, and
i'm unsure why we're starting now (although i understand completely about hiding
duplicate posts)

- --

love and solidarity,



i have a NEW key:
gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys 594B97C2
Key fingerprint = 7B70 F22D F275 D111 3A04  F9EE 0E25 4944 594B 97C2

Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (Darwin)


More information about the IMC-UK-Features mailing list