[Imc-uk-features] 9/11 protests feature
manossi at gmail.com
Sun Sep 17 02:22:08 PDT 2006
> I really don't know if that is possible at all. I'm not at
> all happy with the various alternative articles that have
> been proposed by me, gdm and manos, I think a lot more
> work needs to be done on this.
In my attempt to propose an article, I tried to find the smallest set
of changes to the intially visible Sheffiled article (that appears in
the front page) that would find full consensus. I did this because it
was already september 14th, and the UK feature should appear soon.
I tend to agree with ChrisC (if I understand correctly) that while the
initial article was extemely well researched and written, the
modifications lessen its quality. It is a general problem that while
911 truth activists spend a very long time putting down their
thoughts, we (IMC collective) often dismiss them with one liners, and
have not spend enough time to set our position on the issue. Hopefully
we could use part of this thread to document it better.
As for what IMC sheffield should do, I would find it inappropriate to
discuss it here, since they are fully autonomous in their editorial
decisions. (Particularly when it comes to features, that are not
automatically shared). I am sure Sheffield people following this
thread can report it and they shall take it into account.
More information about the IMC-UK-Features