[Imc-uk-features] [Imc-uk-network] [Imc-london] incriminating video, aka a fine example of Indymedia censorship

[Garcon du Monde]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1



Shiar wrote:
> On Sat, August 18, 2007 4:30 am, Garcon du Monde wrote:
> [...]
>> this arguement is null given that the video *was* only hidden. perhaps a
>> more important point for debate was why the article was edited without
>> any indication that had been done by an indymedia admin.
> 
> So emailing the legal list and the person concerned and leaving an
> internal comment is not enough notification? I didn't notify the features
> list pending the legal discussion, as SAID in the internal comment.

ok, i carelessly neglected to include the word "public" from my sentence
above: it should have read "perhaps a more important point for debate
was why the article was edited without any public indication that had
been done by an indymedia admin."

	--gdm
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
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=WTOK
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----