[Imc-uk-features] back to legal list, was: Respect privacy, was Re: [Imc-london] incriminating video, aka a fine example of Indymedia censorship

[ana]

Hi,

following on with this email that I have already sent to the london list:
----
the original post on this thread was only sent to a _privately archived_
list (imc-uk-legal) and should have never been responded in these
publicly archived lists, can we _please_ respect prople's privacy and
respond only to the list/s where they post in the first place, specially
when that first place was a private archived list or your own personal
email address? You wouldn't like your emails which you think are private
to be posted on a public archive searchable by google would you...?

If you do think the issue should be public, then make "the issue"
public, not people's names and/or addresses and the email they sent in
the first place verbatim.

Thanks for your understanding and future careful consideration.

---

I am now putting these 3 list on emergency moderation until people agree
to post or repost their emails with names removed, or better still,
until a decision is reached in the uk-legal list, where this discussion
was always meant to be had, and that decision is then publicised on this
lists.

If people do not agree you can come to the list or irc; please do not be
offended if you are asked to disconnect and connect back using a secure
(encrypted) connection.

Thanks again for your understanding

ana