[Imc-uk-features] Iran feature proposal

phunkee phunkee at aktivix.org
Mon Feb 5 05:38:52 PST 2007


anarchobabe at fempages.org wrote:

>Hello,
>
>what wonders me is that the Iran feature does not have direct action
>reports. Therefore I am not particularly keen on it. I do believe we
>should not stray into a new editorial policy where we include political
>analysis features which are not based on reports about direct action and
>grassroots campaigns.
>
>The Intelligence feature had some quite interesting subjective reports of
>activists accounts in, so that was kind of better, but in general  imho we
>should avoid opinionated feature articles as well.
>
>cheerio Ulla
>  
>

Hi,

I can't speak for everyone obviously, but i really appreciate features 
that have some kinda analysis or investigative focus rather than the 
bland knitted together reports from the newswire.

It seems to me that at last we're trying to say something, instead of 
just collating reports together and waiting ages to stick them up.

You know i never used to really read the middle column cos it just aped 
the reports on the newswire - there was nothing particularly original or 
engaging about this.

Long live good independent radical journalism on our middle features column!

phunkee





More information about the IMC-UK-Features mailing list