[Imc-uk-features] Iran feature proposal
phunkee
phunkee at aktivix.org
Mon Feb 5 05:38:52 PST 2007
anarchobabe at fempages.org wrote:
>Hello,
>
>what wonders me is that the Iran feature does not have direct action
>reports. Therefore I am not particularly keen on it. I do believe we
>should not stray into a new editorial policy where we include political
>analysis features which are not based on reports about direct action and
>grassroots campaigns.
>
>The Intelligence feature had some quite interesting subjective reports of
>activists accounts in, so that was kind of better, but in general imho we
>should avoid opinionated feature articles as well.
>
>cheerio Ulla
>
>
Hi,
I can't speak for everyone obviously, but i really appreciate features
that have some kinda analysis or investigative focus rather than the
bland knitted together reports from the newswire.
It seems to me that at last we're trying to say something, instead of
just collating reports together and waiting ages to stick them up.
You know i never used to really read the middle column cos it just aped
the reports on the newswire - there was nothing particularly original or
engaging about this.
Long live good independent radical journalism on our middle features column!
phunkee
More information about the IMC-UK-Features
mailing list