[Imc-uk-features] inaccurate, speculative comment, no original grassroots news content

[Chris]

Hi

On Tue 03-Jul-2007 at 10:02:21AM +0100, Ben wrote:
> 
> I'm not interested in wasting time on a debate on this
> so if you have a problem with the hide then put it back
> and I'll do the same with the hides I'm dubious about.

I not sure I understand what this means -- if you are not
prepared to discuss your moderating actions -- which is
what you imply with "I'm not interested in wasting time on
a debate on this" and in addition you are not prepared to
discuss others moderation but you threaten to undo it --
"I'll do the same with the hides I'm dubious about" then
there seems to be a almost total lack of consensual
working?

On Tue 03-Jul-2007 at 10:15:44AM +0100, ftp wrote:
> 
> it isn't just about one post - there is clearly a clash
> of political viewpoints behind it, and these need to
> sorted out so that we can adopt a consensed upon,
> consistent approach to moderating......

I think that questioning the absurd "war on terror" is
essential, it appears from Bens recent actions and his
past actions of hiding posts questioning the official
story of 7/7 and 9/11 that perhaps he is concerned that
Indymedia should not a site on which the official account
of the "war on terror" can be doubted? 

Chris

-- 
Aktivix -- Free Software for a Free World