[Imc-uk-features] [FEAT] London and Glasgow: Brown's 'Bombs'?

[guidoreports at riseup.net]

Ah, so it was Chris that put this in the centre column. Well theres a
surprise. And already Chris' 'truther' mates are congratulating him for
'showing some balls'.

More later, right now I'm tied up with more pressing stuff

Guido



On Sun, July 8, 2007 3:34 pm, wy911 goowy wrote:
> Congratulations on putting this in the middle column.
> Though it doesn't go as far as I'd like, it certainly shows Indymedia
> showing some balls. Brown's balls perhaps
> Paul
> _____________________________________
>
>
> your personal webtop. @ http://www.goowy.com
>
> http://westyorkshiretruth.aceboard.com/
>
>
> http://orgonegifters.aceboard.com/
>
>
>
>
>
> From: Chris[mailto:chris at aktivix.org]
> Sent: Saturday, July 7, 2007 12:47 AM -07:00
> To: IMC UK Features [imc-uk-features at lists.indymedia.org]
> Subject: [Imc-uk-features] [FEAT] London and Glasgow: Brown's 'Bombs'?
>
>
> Hi
>
>
> There are lots of email on this list I want to reply to, I
> don't know if I'll get around to it though...
>
> I thought I'd put some energy into a feature on the recent
> terror incidents, I have been careful to only link to articles which have
> *not* provoked arguments on this
> list...
>
> London and Glasgow: Brown's 'Bombs'?
>
>
> https://www.indymedia.org.uk/images/2007/07/375010.jpg
>
>
> An initial reaction to the failed <a
> href="https://www.indymedia.org.uk/en/2007/07/374985.html">car
> 'bombs'</a> in London from Craig Murray was <a
> href="https://www.indymedia.org.uk/en/2007/06/374688.html">cui
> bono?</a> - who benifts? The mainstream media recated in the <a
> href="https://www.indymedia.org.uk/en/2007/07/374997.html">usual
> way</a> , Brown continues with further <a
> href="https://www.indymedia.org.uk/en/2007/07/375231.html">attacks
> on civil liberties</a>, and the European Commission wants to <a
> href="https://www.indymedia.org.uk/en/2007/07/375226.html">suppress
> internet bomb-making guides</a>. Nafeez Ahmed asks <a
> href="https://www.indymedia.org.uk/en/2007/07/375302.html">whose
> bombs?</a> and John Pilger says <a
> href="https://www.indymedia.org.uk/en/2007/07/375344.html">these
> are Brown's bombs, too</a>. What is clear is that the imperial genocide
> perpotrated by the <a
> href="https://www.indymedia.org.uk/en/2007/03/364938.html">Empire</a>,
> which by last year had resulted in at least <a
> href="https://www.indymedia.org.uk/en/2006/10/353252.html">600,000
> dead</a> in Iraq and has caused between <a
> href="https://www.indymedia.org.uk/en/2007/05/371890.html">20
> and 30 million deaths</a> since World War II is of no comparision to the
> botched attacks in the UK - it's business as usual for the Military
> Industrial Complex.
>
>
> It's on the wiki so best make any improvements to it
> there:
>
>
> https://docs.indymedia.org/view/Local/UkFeatureLondonGlasgowTerror
>
>
> If people think it's not a suitable item for a feature
> perhaps remembering that we actually put out a statment on 7/7 two years
> ago might make a difference?
>
> https://www.indymedia.org.uk/en/static/londonattack
>
>
> If people really don't want it on the front page then
> would anyone object to it being a topic feature for the Terror War topic?
>
>
> Chris
>
>
>
> --
> Indymedia United Kollektives editorial: features and wire moderation
> http://lists.indymedia.org/mailman/listinfo/imc-uk-features
> --
> Indymedia United Kollektives editorial: features and wire moderation
> http://lists.indymedia.org/mailman/listinfo/imc-uk-features